To: tioga
It’s humiliating and OTT, but comparing it to sexual abuse trivialises the genuine article, which this was certainly not...
39 posted on
04/02/2008 5:09:20 PM PDT by
thundrey
To: thundrey
“It’s humiliating and OTT, but comparing it to sexual abuse trivialises the genuine article, which this was certainly not...”
Its not physical rape but it is sexual abuse. Forcing a child to strip meets the definition of sexual battery. It was certainly traumatic for this young girl.
To: thundrey
It’s humiliating and OTT, but comparing it to sexual abuse trivialises the genuine article, which this was certainly not...
If they had taken pictures, it would have been a Federal felony.
45 posted on
04/02/2008 5:30:34 PM PDT by
gitmo
(From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
To: thundrey
breasts and crotch ARE sexual, ya can’t deny that......
49 posted on
04/02/2008 5:37:20 PM PDT by
tioga
To: thundrey
It’s humiliating and OTT, but comparing it to sexual abuse trivialises the genuine article, which this was certainly not... She was raped. Pure and simple. The only think missing was penetration and that doesn't always happen in lesbian rape anyway.
The perps need to be dealt with as rapists.
85 posted on
04/03/2008 5:59:58 AM PDT by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson