Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hoover Planned on Arresting 12 Thousand “Traitors”
Javno ^ | December 23, 2007 | Joseph Stedul

Posted on 04/04/2008 11:24:46 AM PDT by SpaceBar

After 50 years, an American state secret has been revealed, about the arrest of 12,000 people because of Hoover’s “red” paranoia.

The former director of the FBI, Edgar Hoover made plans for the arrest of 12,000 American citizens which he considered to be threats to national security – documents reveals that no longer bear the status of state secret.

Hoover sent this request to the president at the time Harry Truman at the beginning of the Korean war during the 50s.

He justified the move as necessary for protection from “treason, spies and sabotage”. For now there is no evidence to whether these arrests actually occurred in practice or not.

Changes of laws due to “exceptional circumstances”

Hoover asked Truman to suspend the century old right to a defence in court that protected the individual citizens from unlawful arrest (better known as Habeas Corpus). Hoover planned on breaking this law and putting 12,000 people in military and federal prisons. The list of suspects took years to make, and the moment came to implement the plans of illegal confinement. The American Congress authorised the law in July 1950 after the Korea was broke out.

Truman said that an exceptional situation was at hand, and that his changes must be implemented.

Today, those secret documents no longer carry the marking of state secret, and the public has had an opportunity to see their contents. As mentioned, 12 thousand people were in question, of which 97 percent were American citizens.
(more at link...)


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coldwar; communismkills; evilempire; harrytruman; jedgarhoover; koreanwar; nationalsecurity; stalinists; truman; unclejoestalin; usefulidiots; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2008 11:24:46 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

I am reminded of the punchline of that old joke about a busload of lawyers going over a cliff.


2 posted on 04/04/2008 11:26:02 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Hoover planned on breaking this law and putting 12,000 people in military and federal prisons.

If the President suspends habeas corpus, as Hoover asked him to, it would in no way be breaking the law since it is a presidential prerogative explicitly enshrined in the Constitution.

3 posted on 04/04/2008 11:27:14 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

12,000? What’s the point? It’s a drop in the bucket.


4 posted on 04/04/2008 11:28:56 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I am betting that it would be an entirely different world we would be living in today if he did it though...


5 posted on 04/04/2008 11:30:35 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

I would wonder if J. Edgar would have led the charge in drag or not?


6 posted on 04/04/2008 11:31:12 AM PDT by brooklyn dave (Proud to be an Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The point is that this is a shot over the bow should anyone even think that rounding up islamist terrorists is a good idea.
7 posted on 04/04/2008 11:31:37 AM PDT by null and void (If you thought Congress was bad you ought to see what the folks who admit they are criminals can do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

funny, considering your tagline. the president has NO authority to suspend Habeaus Corpus. Congress can ONLY overturn Habeaus during a rebellion or an invasion


8 posted on 04/04/2008 11:32:36 AM PDT by ChurtleDawg (voting only encourages them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I'm not sure any president has the lawful authority to suspend the writ of habeas corpus.

But nobody stopped Lincoln when he did it.

9 posted on 04/04/2008 11:33:08 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

If he had done it and gotten rid of them, we might not have 100 million plus traitors today.


10 posted on 04/04/2008 11:34:44 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

A good place to start would be outside the DNC convention. Just wrap the place in razor wire, put guards on the doors and be done with it ;-)


11 posted on 04/04/2008 11:37:33 AM PDT by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brooklyn dave
Despite the oft-repeated rumor, there is not a single piece of reliable evidence that J. Edgar Hoover ever dressed in women's clothing.

All these references can be traced to a single page in a single book by BBC journalist Tony Summers in which he claims that an unidentified source told Summers that the source had twice seen Hoover in drag.

Summers also believes that American right-wingers plotted to assassinate President Kennedy.

12 posted on 04/04/2008 11:38:03 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

JEHoover should have at least followed up on Joe McCarthy’s work and chased the traitors out of the country. That would have been a good thing!


13 posted on 04/04/2008 11:39:36 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: brooklyn dave

“I would wonder if J. Edgar would have led the charge in drag or not?”


Hoover was not a cross-dresser.

It was made up out of thin air, and became a part of common knowledge through the efforts of the media and it’s cultural siblings.


14 posted on 04/04/2008 11:40:28 AM PDT by ansel12 (If your profit margin relies on criminality to suppress wages, then you deserve to be out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

Since it is the responsibility of the executive to provide a writ of habeas corpus, the suspension of the writ would entail the executive not providing it - but not providing it only in the circumstances above described.

15 posted on 04/04/2008 11:42:23 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

“paranoia” ?????

You call it paranoia after those people have carried us so deep into Socialism that we can’t even drill for oil on our own land or build nuclear power plants????? You call that paranoia?

They’ve taken over our government so that it won’t even maintain our borders, and you call it paranoia?????

They’ve installed Gorbachev right her in the United States and sent Jimmy Carter, who gave away our very strategic Panama Canal, all over the world encouraging tyrants, and you call Hoover’s concern paranoia? That’s what the Communists call it.

I call it telling the truth when others hid and still hide their eyes and ears.


16 posted on 04/04/2008 11:47:00 AM PDT by RoadTest ( None calleth for justice, nor any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies - Isaiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
For now there is no evidence to whether these arrests actually occurred in practice or not.

And there never will be.

17 posted on 04/04/2008 11:48:22 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
You call it paranoia...

I didn't write it, just posted it. My opinion is the first comment.
18 posted on 04/04/2008 11:48:56 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Habeas Corpus writs are issued by the courts, not the executive. Any citizen in custody has the right to apply for one in court.


19 posted on 04/04/2008 11:48:56 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

The FBI has no authority to “followed up on Joe McCarthy’s work and chased the traitors out of the country.” The AG msut authorize such actions.


20 posted on 04/04/2008 11:50:15 AM PDT by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson