Posted on 04/05/2008 9:51:28 AM PDT by kingattax
. But the reason Ms. Clinton is so unappealing has nothing to do with her face, but rather the arrogance and dishonesty reflected upon her by her parents.
In the same way as Paris Hilton reflects the values of her mother and father, Chelsea is a reflection of Bill and Hillary Clinton. In the great scheme of things neither Chelsea nor Paris contribute much of anything to our society.
“They are probably paying their family members off so they stay out of the news. It would be a good place to be........unless you should disappear or something.”
Hey, what’s the point of paying hush money if nobody stays hushed?
Chelsea may look hot, but she is still ugly.
What????
Right you are... And borrowing her mother’s stupid “head-bob” doesn’t help... Thankfully, I’ve never seen her do the lip-bite.
Hmmmmm....typical with the Clintons. Deducting used underwear, and “imputing” interest on interest free loans to family members. They try to deduct the income or at least show some kind of expense (you can bet your ass the loan money came out of some business they have set up), yet I bet if you check the “family members’” returns you won’t see any of that loan interest shown as “imputed income!” What a bunch of damn shysters!
The investigation and findings will probably originate and be released on this site because it seems the best collection of intrepid investigators are members of FreeRepublic.
The Clintons are NOT deducting imputed interest, they are reporting it as INCOME. It just so happens, this is the law. I dislike the Clintons as much as anyone, but please don’t make uninformed comments. You just blow any credibility you might have.
If Hillary loses this election, Chelsea and Bill had better hide out real good. Hillary will become paranoid about tell-all books on her craziness and pinache for faking the truth.
The smartest woman in the world has become the most dangerous nag in the world.
Looks like a pared down nose and a chin added.
***********************************************
Yep ,, got rid of the Hubble chin and nose..
As Dan Rather and Mary Mapes might attest!
I can’t stand the Clintons... but to put Chelsea’s name in the same sentence with Paris isn’t fair. Considering her parents, I think Chelsea has turned out better than could have been expected...waaaaaay better than Paris! No comparison!!!!
Maybe so, but for someone who takes a deduction on used underwear donations, making interest free loans and then claiming the imputed interest as income as required is atypical for them even if it is required.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.