Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bernard Marx

“I remember all too well other pro-Soviet Hollywood propaganda during WWII.”

Weren’t those made by a virtual FDR fiat/commission? What would have been the consequence of making films disparaging the ally at that time.

I was looking at the Chicago Tribune Archives recently back to the 1940s when they carried Hedda Hopper’s column. She claimed ‘Mr. Smith Goes to Washington’ was anti-American propaganda intended to make the U.S. system look corrupt and took special exception to the innocuous 1944 Chopin biopic ‘A Song to Remember’. Her objection was that they made Chopin mouth various revolutionary (read Bolshevik) desires about overthrowing the Tzar whereas the historical Chopin was a nobleman’s son. The fact was that he hated what the Russians were doing to Poland hence his anti-Tzarist feelings.


56 posted on 04/21/2008 3:24:39 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Borges
There was nothing to be gained by disparaging an "ally." So what was to be gained by turning a bloodthirsty totalitarian tyrant into an iconical "uncle" figure?

While Russia was a wartime "ally," FDR remained nearly terminally obtuse about Communism, Stalin and Soviet aims. He was influenced by the Communists and Fellow Travelers who riddled his administration. Hollywood had more than its share as well. If you choose to sugar-coat those facts I won't waste a lot more time trying to argue with you.

57 posted on 04/21/2008 4:27:41 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson