Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: devane617
Monopolies are antithetical to competition. Competition is a healthy thing in a free market enterprise system. I detect by the tone of your posts that you don't like the traditional media (MSM) outlets, but countering one bad idea with another isn't an intelligent solution. Sure, you'll get some new content... for a while, and once they've got you by the short and curlies your back to a single narrow information pipe with one gatekeeper. Then you'll be screaming about the MSM in the sky.
21 posted on 04/08/2008 7:37:44 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: SpaceBar

...your arguments were heard when cable tv came along. huge outcry by media, but we know how that turned out. to stifle technology is crazy. the merger will happen in one form or another. one of the two companies will go bk, so ultimately you will have one company.


26 posted on 04/08/2008 7:40:42 AM PDT by devane617 (My Kharma Ran Over Your Dogma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: SpaceBar

A combined XM/Sirius would not be a monopoly. Sure, they’ll probably carve off some duplicative programing, but that’s about it.

If they increased price, I would be more than happy to take that money and give it to Apple for a few extra iTunes downloads.

Terrestrial does not want the competition from Satrad. Period. Especially since their competing platform “HD Radio” is a complete and total non-starter.

In any event, DOJ has already signed off on the new pricing plan, so no worries on that.


28 posted on 04/08/2008 7:46:44 AM PDT by Loyolas Mattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: SpaceBar
Monopolies are antithetical to competition. Competition is a healthy thing in a free market enterprise system. I detect by the tone of your posts that you don't like the traditional media (MSM) outlets, but countering one bad idea with another isn't an intelligent solution. Sure, you'll get some new content... for a while, and once they've got you by the short and curlies your back to a single narrow information pipe with one gatekeeper. Then you'll be screaming about the MSM in the sky.

The XM/Sirius merger would be monopolistic exactly how? Once XM and Sirius merge, would you no longer be able to listen to any other form of audio content?

The very fact that the NAB protested this merger so vigorously proves that they compete with satellite radio. Since they do, how can a combined XM/Sirius be monopolistic? The market is audio, not satellite radio.

Sheesh.

33 posted on 04/08/2008 8:08:42 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson