Hyperbole...”might”....This is not about theoretical extremes, it’s about real world/real time cause and effect. Injury *has* been sustained. The real life plaintiffs, are seeking redress for the harm done them. The harm doner them was triggered by the victim wearing the merchandise(shirt) of one rapper, by the fans and supporters of another rapper, who were antagonistic of the other. These fans, diectly influenced by the verbal war, attacked the victim based upon the fact that he was wearing the other rappers shirt. Violence was done based specifically on the effect of the rappers musical violence.
They are going to lose. It’s art. It’s protected. The case has no merit.