"CLOSELY SIMULATING THE TYPE OF SPORES USED IN THE ACTUAL ATTACK"
Congratulations ZacanPook for finding the key sentence that demonstrates the new CDC/Dugway paper methodology for simulating the type of spores used in the actual attack. I'm waiting for Ed to come back here soon claiming that this plainly written statement doesn't really mean what it says.
Maybe you should have made the statement in Fire-engine red font with EXTRA LARGE font for the word ACTUAL.
Just in case Ed doesn't know what "ACTUAL" means, I've provided a definition below:
Main Entry: ac·tu·al
Pronunciation: \ˈak-ch(ə-w)əl, -sh(ə-w)əl; -chü-əl, -shü-\ Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English actuel, from Late Latin actualis, from Latin actus act
Date: 14th century
1obsolete : active
2 a: existing in act and not merely potentially b:
existing in fact or reality c: not false or apparent
3: existing or occurring at the time : current the actual commission of a crime>
I'm waiting for Ed to come back here soon claiming that this plainly written statement doesn't really mean what it says.
One minute you're telling us the coated spores were created fifty years ago. The next minute you're telling us the coated spores were created to simulate what was used in the attacks of 2001? Which is it?
Picking sentences out of context and trying to prove they mean something just shows that the article doesn't really say anything significant about the anthrax attacks. You have to SPIN things to make the words seem to mean something.
Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com
posted on 04/29/2008 2:39:38 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson