Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: richardtavor
The reference was to "continuous" deposits of oil not gas [gas is likely to be the vast bulk of the future production from the Woodford shale as evidenced by current Barnett shale production.] Gas from shale may surprise the pessimists [it won't be easy or cheap but gassy shales cover a large area — the buzz in the popular press lately has been about the prospects in New York State / Pennsylvania for a significant gas from shale recovery. It is much easier to be an optimist about natural gas given that it can be produced economically from some reservoirs with quite low permiability.

As I understand it, the Bakken is a different animal. Free thermally mature oil, still in the source formation [or at least the sandy dolomitic layer between the thicker shale layers. Add in [hopefully for those drilling the well] some natural fracturing, and a gigantic assist from massive lateral(s) and likewise massive slick water frac jobs and you end up with some potentially very significant fields.

17 posted on 04/13/2008 9:38:48 AM PDT by R W Reactionairy ("Everyone is entitled to their own opinion ... but not to their own facts" Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: R W Reactionairy

Well, get ready, the Woodford shale is also an oil producer, and it is finally starting to be drilled for....I am about to drill my first horizontal Woodford oil well-but there have been already 7 commercial Woodford Oil wells. The significance is that the Woodford was deposited virtually all over Oklahoma. So, get ready.


25 posted on 04/13/2008 1:27:36 PM PDT by richardtavor (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem in the name of the G-d of Jacob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson