1 posted on
04/14/2008 12:49:16 AM PDT by
Fred
To: Fred
2 posted on
04/14/2008 1:02:26 AM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(Democrats - The Original Slave Owners)
To: Fred
Things will be all better when the ice age comes.
3 posted on
04/14/2008 1:03:52 AM PDT by
pallis
To: Fred
There have been voices crying in the wilderness for more than a year now that this sudden surge of interest in ethanol made no sense financially and would result in less food grown.
It’s been a Ponzi scheme from the very beginning and it’s going to get worse before it gets better. Food prices are crazy now and going to get worse.
4 posted on
04/14/2008 1:13:40 AM PDT by
Ronin
(Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
To: Fred
This also has to do with these corrupt regimes that promote hunger. North Korea and Zimbabwe both had starving citizens before this ethanol craziness hit, and yet this author doesn't blame the corrupt leadership for their part in this mess.
It's also time for Americans to demand a moon landing/manhattan type of project for our energy needs, to get the US to stop kissing the ring of the saudis and crazies like hugo chavez.
7 posted on
04/14/2008 1:30:13 AM PDT by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: Fred
Use of orn for vehicles has nothing to do with climate change.
It is wlefare for farmers plain and simple. It is uneconomical pandering of the worst kind, but since the Iowa caucus is so important, it never ends.
This author seems quite myopic in his understanding and pretty much set out with a conclusion and tortured his subject to agree with him.
Stupid drivel worthy of a liberal.
To: Fred
Hey, at least Al Gore seems to be eating well: Ruth’s Chris, Le Cirque 2000 and Delmonico’s is a long way from eating grass, isn’t it?
10 posted on
04/14/2008 1:54:25 AM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only Hillary or Obama can!)
To: Fred
"The reality is that people are dying already,"
EXCELSIOR!
Thought that was one of the points of the greenies: less people - yes?
11 posted on
04/14/2008 1:54:44 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Fred; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; IrishCatholic; Delacon; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; ...
To: Fred
The eco-weenies will say it is just the Malthusian Operator kicking in, and starvation is all for the good of Gaia.
14 posted on
04/14/2008 3:21:21 AM PDT by
gridlock
(Proud McCain Supporter since February 8, 2008.)
To: Fred
Is the UN now working for big oil?
We pay through the nose for oil. Let them bid the price of corn up a keep it away from the distillers. What they do not tell you is that most countries do not eat that much corn, it is Wheat and rice they consume.
16 posted on
04/14/2008 3:38:18 AM PDT by
chainsaw
( No black racist Muslims in the WH.)
To: Fred
We drive, they starve. The mass diversion of the North American grain harvest into ethanol plants for fuel is reaching its political and moral limits. What a load of horse hockey. You want to feed the masses? Abolish OPEC and drill in North America. That'll loosen up the grain stocks. Otherwise sit down and STFU Mr. Ambrose Evans-Prissie.
17 posted on
04/14/2008 3:39:21 AM PDT by
RoadKingSE
(How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash?)
To: Fred
"..The UN says it takes 232kg of corn to fill a 50-litre car tank with ethanol. That is enough to feed a child for a year. Last week, the UN predicted "massacres" unless the biofuel policy is halted..."
Ethanol is a scam!
To: Fred
This article gave me a headache. I can’t deal with all these metric numbers so early in the morning.
20 posted on
04/14/2008 5:35:47 AM PDT by
Condor51
(I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson