Posted on 04/14/2008 10:26:30 AM PDT by BGHater
More than 3,500 Bigfoot creatures exist nationwide, Biscardi said. Theyre nocturnal creatures and theyre migratory, he said. They move from south to north this time of year.
The likelihood of these things being true is, oh, about nil, I'd say.
Well, if it’s stupid enough to try to eat a minivan, I don’t know what that says about it’s danger to us. Don’t hide in cars and vans? If it comes after you, throw it a car?
*snicker*
Yeah, and amazingly while we have enough photo and video evidence to prove that a Grizzly Bear does exist, we have yet to have one solid picture of this so-called creature having a refreshing drink from a stream...
Hmmm. Sounds bitter.
In order for over 3,000 large primates to exist in this country and not be regularly spotted would mean they have supernatural abilities, which would make the likelihood of their existence to be zero.
You’d think with no corpses found, or no live captures, that you are correct and this appeals to our curiosity, keeping the story alive. But there have been so many sightings, in nearly every state, that I have to give it a 0.1% chance. Too many people have had vivd sightings of upright walking creatures of this mold.
As many “bitter” Americans there are around this country during hunting season, I would say that the chances are less than zero.
This guy is not a big believer in Occam’s Razor, eh?
“Could be a bear, but most likely a bigfoot”
If it can bite tires and crumple up metal, it shouldn’t have a problem eating lead.
Where has Butch Rhino been lately?
Too many people have had vivd sightings of upright walking creatures of this mold.
It seems to me that what abounds are hoaxers and dupes. But I guess you had to be there...(grin)...
Yet no mention of anyone analyzing the blood... If these things existed, you'd be able to find a youtube video.
Jeez. With bite marks and blood samples, you’d think it would be relatively easy to determine whether the perpetrator is a hoax, a bear or a previously unknow species of animal.
Also, I would think that a forensic footprint analyst could determine the weight distribution of whatever made the print, thereby getting a rough approximation of it’s mass (i.e. a little guy wearing big fake feet, vs. an animal that really has the heft one would expect for a print that size).
Yeah, and amazingly while we have enough photo and video evidence to prove that a Grizzly Bear does exist, we have yet to have one solid picture of this so-called creature having a refreshing drink from a stream...
Well, there's the Patterson-Gimlin fake, uh, I mean footage...clear proof, for sure...
Right. And he clearly doesn’t understand the meaning of the words “most likely”...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.