Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb
Modern journalism.

U.S. District Court Judge James Beaty Jr. on Tuesday denied a motion for sanctions filed by Duke University and the City of Durham and ruled that the legal team for 38 members of the 2005-06 Duke lacrosse team had violated ethical rules by using a Web site, news conference and news release to publicize the filing of their case.

Shouldn't that be: "had not violated ethical rules...."??????

9 posted on 04/15/2008 1:44:30 PM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rednesss

I am curious myself - which is it?


11 posted on 04/15/2008 1:48:32 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: rednesss

Same thoughts I had. Still don’t know the answers, but any time Jamie Gorelick gets kicked in the a$$ is a good time for all of us.


13 posted on 04/15/2008 1:51:18 PM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: rednesss; abb
Currently at the link: "U.S. District Court Judge James Beaty Jr. on Tuesday denied a motion for sanctions filed by Duke University and the City of Durham and ruled that the legal team for 38 members of the 2005-06 Duke lacrosse team had not violated ethical rules by using a Web site, news conference and news release to publicize the filing of their case.

The original version makes no sense, the current version does.

If someone subscribes, they might look at that last sentence as well. It doesn't seem to make much sense, either.

25 posted on 04/15/2008 3:59:56 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson