Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

I agree. And, I think it is a wholesale violation of rights - parents’ and childrens’. Again, if supervision is in place children and their mothers ought to be allowed to be together until things are sorted out and specific cases identified where state intervention is justified. Some dangerous precedents are being set in this case my friends.


8 posted on 04/15/2008 5:29:12 PM PDT by tripod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: tripod

I’m going to have to agree with you on that.


13 posted on 04/15/2008 5:36:09 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (McCain is rock solid on SCOTUS judicial appointments. He voted for Ginsberg, Kennedy and Souter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: tripod
No precedents have been set yet and I think once this is adjudicated we are going to find that this looks a lot more like Branch Dividian do over then some holy crusade. The start of it is at the least questionable they have one complaint from a 16 year old child and now we have 400+ in custody. Why? Was the search warrant written in such broad and nebulous terms that they could grab what is basically a small towns entire child population while we're looking for her?
31 posted on 04/15/2008 5:48:30 PM PDT by kublia khan (Absolute war brings total victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson