To: DoughtyOne
I agree. And, I think it is a wholesale violation of rights - parents’ and childrens’. Again, if supervision is in place children and their mothers ought to be allowed to be together until things are sorted out and specific cases identified where state intervention is justified. Some dangerous precedents are being set in this case my friends.
8 posted on
04/15/2008 5:29:12 PM PDT by
tripod
To: tripod
I’m going to have to agree with you on that.
13 posted on
04/15/2008 5:36:09 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(McCain is rock solid on SCOTUS judicial appointments. He voted for Ginsberg, Kennedy and Souter.)
To: tripod
No precedents have been set yet and I think once this is adjudicated we are going to find that this looks a lot more like Branch Dividian do over then some holy crusade. The start of it is at the least questionable they have one complaint from a 16 year old child and now we have 400+ in custody. Why? Was the search warrant written in such broad and nebulous terms that they could grab what is basically a small towns entire child population while we're looking for her?
31 posted on
04/15/2008 5:48:30 PM PDT by
kublia khan
(Absolute war brings total victory)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson