Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ohwhynot
...marijuana being less addictive than tobacco,...

Yep!

...and your other "assumptions" are based on what? A does not equal B... just because someone posits it!

19 posted on 04/16/2008 12:58:06 AM PDT by WVKayaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: WVKayaker

If you’re really interested, I could track down the sources myself.

But is it really necessary? Even pro-marijuana groups admit that it harms the lungs, albeit on a lesser scale than tobacco.

Any form of smoke damages the lungs. It’s not an issue of what you’re burning to do so; inhaling wood smoke in the same quantity and manner as tobacco or marijuana would cause similar long-term health issues.


21 posted on 04/16/2008 1:14:37 AM PDT by Ohwhynot (Any form of smoke will damage the lungs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson