Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

I don’t think DUI should itself be illegal. Breaking a traffic law or getting in an accident is all that should be charged. If the drunk kills someone, then charge them with manslaughter. Cops can’t pull you over for because you don’t have a seatbelt on. The seatbelt infraction is tacked on if your stopped for a real moving violation. The same should apply to DUI. It should be tacked on in ADDITION to whatever other violation you committed.


17 posted on 04/16/2008 9:34:43 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: LetsRok
The same should apply to DUI. It should be tacked on in ADDITION to whatever other violation you committed.

You're comparing seat belt offenses to DUI? A drunk driver poses an increased risk to the drivers around him. A person not wearing his seat belt poses no additional direct risk.

We have laws against DUI for the same reason we have laws against speeding or reckless driving or even failure to signal--when an operator disregards these laws, there is an increased risk of danger for other motorists.

23 posted on 04/16/2008 9:41:11 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: LetsRok

I hate to tell you this, but in the People’s Republic of New Jersey, and a few other places, I believe, the seatbelt laws have been upgraded to a primary offense...in other words, a cop can pull you over if he sees you driving without the belt, no other infraction is necessary.


24 posted on 04/16/2008 9:42:04 AM PDT by Sterm26 (Death before Dhimmitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: LetsRok
Cops can’t pull you over for because you don’t have a seatbelt on. The seatbelt infraction is tacked on if your stopped for a real moving violation. The same should apply to DUI. It should be tacked on in ADDITION to whatever other violation you committed.

Seat belts are a Primary offense in many places now...that gets em to the door for a sniff test...

like you said, there are already mechanisms for dealing with the damage done by any negligent behavior in a car...

using arbitrary numbers and thug tactics is just plain wrong and shouldnt be accepted a 'felony', which results in loss of Rights...

34 posted on 04/16/2008 9:54:06 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Choose Liberty over slavery... the gulag awaits ANY compromise with evil...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: LetsRok
I don’t think DUI should itself be illegal. Breaking a traffic law or getting in an accident is all that should be charged.

I agree with you 100%, and I've been saying that here on FR for a long time!

38 posted on 04/16/2008 10:38:43 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: LetsRok
I don’t think DUI should itself be illegal. Breaking a traffic law or getting in an accident is all that should be charged. If the drunk kills someone, then charge them with manslaughter.

I agree. Without damage to people or property, there should be no crime.

(but that would open the door to re-examining the war on "some" drugs, gambling, prostitution, refusing to replace your paper or plastic grocery bags with a reusable burlap bag and all sorts of other things that the control freaks in our society find offensive).

59 posted on 04/16/2008 8:46:22 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: LetsRok
Cops can’t pull you over for because you don’t have a seatbelt on.

That's not true in my State.

68 posted on 04/17/2008 6:55:40 AM PDT by no nau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson