Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Workers suing Pilgrimís Pride claim arrests strengthen case
Chattanooga Free Press ^ | 4/17/08 | Dave Flessner

Posted on 04/17/2008 7:18:06 PM PDT by kiriath_jearim

Lawyers suing Pilgrim’s Pride in Alabama said Wednesday’s roundup of undocumented employees at other company plants underscores their claims that the chicken-processing giant illegally is hiring immigrant workers to suppress wages.

“Assuming that these individuals being detained are found to be in this country illegally, I think it reinforces our contention that there has been an ongoing practice of employing illegal workers at Pilgrim’s Pride,” said Jeremy Hutchinson, a Little Rock, Ark., attorney who is soliciting plaintiffs for a potential class-action suit against the company.

Pilgrim’s Pride, the nation’s largest chicken company with more than 54,000 employees at 37 plants, insists it uncovered instances of identity theft and has worked with the federal government to verify employees’ citizenship and enforce immigration laws. Company spokesman Ray Atkinson said Pilgrim’s Pride “shares the government’s goal” of not employing illegal immigrants and fully cooperated in the 15-month-long investigation of identify theft by some of its workers.

“We do everything we can and use all the tools available to verify work authorization,” Mr. Atkinson said.

A federal grand jury in Tyler, Texas, returned indictments this month against 45 Pilgrim’s Pride employees, but the company is not charged with any civil or criminal charges, officials said. The indictments were sealed until Wednesday’s arrest of 280 foreign nationals in five states.

Chicago attorney Howard Foster, one of the lead attorneys in the civil action against Pilgrim’s Pride in Alabama, said the government’s actions “strengthen the merits of our case and adds credibility to what we are saying.”

Similar to other lawsuits filed against Tyson Foods and Mohawk Industries, Mr. Foster and other attorneys are trying to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), a law passed to fight organized crime. Under the law, they are suing employers for allegedly using illegal immigrants to cut their costs and reduce worker wages.

In a 21-page complaint filed in March, Mr. Foster and other lawyers said the use of illegal immigrants was saving Pilgrim’s Pride millions of dollars annually and that without such workers other employees would be paid “significantly higher” wages.

“This is because illegal immigrants will work for extremely low wages and in deplorable working conditions, which has been referred to as a form of modern-day indentured servitude,” Mr. Foster said.

The plaintiffs in such cases have not yet won any verdicts, although there was a $1.3 million settlement last year with the Zirkle Fruit Co. in Selah, Wash.

In the lawsuit filed against Pilgrim’s Pride in Alabama, an employee at the company’s Russellville, Ala., poultry plant is suing under RICO. He contends that Pilgrim’s Pride is depressing his wages by conspiring to hire undocumented workers at below-market wages through an “illegal immigrant hiring scheme.”

U.S. District Court Judge C. Lynwood Smith in Alabama has limited the civil action against Pilgrim’s Pride so far to the poultry processing plant in Russellville. But plaintiff attorneys hope eventually to widen the class-action suit to include other Southern plants, including Pilgrim Pride’s two Chattanooga plants.

Dozens of employees from other Pilgrim’s Pride plants already have agreed to join in any subsequent suit, Mr. Foster said.

“We’ve talked with many people and we continue to hear from workers about repeated instances of illegal workers being hired or retained,” he said. “We contend that the company knows that these employees are using stolen documents to get and keep their jobs.”

In a similar lawsuit against Tyson Foods in federal court in Chattanooga, Mr. Foster claimed that Tyson workers deserved another $25 million because of illegal use of undocumented workers. But U.S. District Court Judge Curtis Collier dismissed that lawsuit in February. Lawyers now are appealing the case.

Mr. Atkinson said Pilgrim’s Pride has employed outside experts to help with its immigration compliance and regularly audits its personnel and procedures to limit any illegal hiring activity. The company voluntarily has participated for the past couple of years in E-verify, the federal program designed to determine employment eligibility for all new hires.

But Mr. Atkinson said federal officials have acknowledged that E-Verify “cannot detect identity theft situations.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: aliens; economics; illegals; immigration; lawsuit; pilgrimspride; poultry

1 posted on 04/17/2008 7:18:06 PM PDT by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Another article said it was the company that called ICE, so it seems like they are trying to clean up.


2 posted on 04/17/2008 7:20:51 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Copy of plaintiffs’ Complaint:

http://media.timesfreepress.com/docs/2008/04/Pilgrim_Pride.pdf


3 posted on 04/17/2008 7:21:05 PM PDT by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Pilgrim’s Pride press release:

http://media.timesfreepress.com/docs/2008/04/PilgrimPridepressrelease.pdf


4 posted on 04/17/2008 7:22:37 PM PDT by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

That seems a bit harsh if the company called ICE in the first place and asked for an investigation. Surely it is in the Union’s interest to help them oust the illegal aliens, not sue them.


5 posted on 04/17/2008 7:22:39 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
Similar to other lawsuits filed against Tyson Foods and Mohawk Industries, Mr. Foster and other attorneys are trying to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), a law passed to fight organized crime. Under the law, they are suing employers for allegedly using illegal immigrants to cut their costs and reduce worker wages.

Finally someone is actually using the RICO statute in the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act to go after businesses. It can also be used against local governments. Per the law:

Federal Immigration and Nationality Act

Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens Enforcement RICO —Citizen Recourse Tax Crimes Comment

Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) "Any person who . . . encourages or induces an illegal alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each illegal alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."

Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):

A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:

· assists an illegal alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or · encourages that illegal alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or · knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions. ·

Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.

Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens

It is unlawful to hire an alien, to recruit an alien, or to refer an illegal alien for a fee, knowing the illegal alien is unauthorized to work in the United States. It is equally unlawful to continue to employ an illegal alien knowing that the illegal alien is unauthorized to work.

It is unlawful to hire any individual for employment in the United States without complying with employment eligibility verification requirements. Requirements include examination of identity documents and completion of Form I-9 for every employee hired. Employers must retain all I-9s, and, with three days' advance notice, the forms must be made available for inspection. Employment includes any service or labor performed for any type of remuneration within the United States, with the exception of sporadic domestic service by an individual in a private home. "Day laborers" or other casual workers engaged in any compensated activity (with the above exception) are employees for purposes of immigration law. An employer includes an agent or anyone acting directly or indirectly in the interest of the employer. For purposes of verification of authorization to work, employer also means an independent contractor, or a contractor other than the person using the illegal alien labor.

The use of temporary or short-term contracts cannot be used to circumvent the employment authorization verification requirements. If employment is to be for less than the usual three days allowed for completing the I-9 Form requirement, the form must be completed immediately at the time of hire.

An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts. Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information available to the employer that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the employer's work force. Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of an individual's accent or foreign appearance.

Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien work force of dance hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion that unlawful conduct had occurred.

It is illegal for nonprofit or religious organizations to knowingly assist an employer to violate employment sanctions, regardless of claims that their convictions require them to assist illegal aliens. Harboring or aiding illegal aliens is not protected by the First Amendment. It is a felony to establish a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of federal immigration law. Violators may be fined or imprisoned for up to five years.

Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens

It is a violation of law for any person to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection in any place, including any building or means of transportation, any illegal alien who is in the United States in violation of law. Harboring means any conduct that tends to substantially facilitate an alien to remain in the U.S. illegally. The sheltering need not be clandestine, and harboring covers aliens arrested outdoors, as well as in a building. This provision includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally but has since lost his legal status.

An employer can be convicted of the felony of harboring illegal aliens who are his employees if he takes actions in reckless disregard of their illegal status, such as ordering them to obtain false documents, altering records, obstructing INS inspections, or taking other actions that facilitate the alien's illegal employment. Any person who within any 12-month period hires ten or more individuals with actual knowledge that they are illegal aliens or unauthorized workers is guilty of felony harboring. It is also a felony to encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in the U.S. knowing or recklessly disregarding the fact that the alien's entry or residence is in violation of the law. This crime applies to any person, rather than just employers of illegal aliens. Courts have ruled that "encouraging" includes counseling illegal aliens to continue working in the U.S. or assisting them to complete applications with false statements or obvious errors. The fact that the alien is a refugee fleeing persecution is not a defense to this felony, since U.S. law and the UN Protocol on Refugees both require that a refugee must report to immigration authorities without delay upon entry to the U.S.

The penalty for felony harboring is a fine and imprisonment for up to five years. The penalty for felony alien smuggling is a fine and up to ten years' imprisonment. Where the crime causes serious bodily injury or places the life of any person in jeopardy, the penalty is a fine and up to twenty years' imprisonment. If the criminal smuggling or harboring results in the death of any person, the penalty can include life imprisonment. Convictions for aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to commit alien smuggling or harboring, carry the same penalties. Courts can impose consecutive prison sentences for each alien smuggled or harbored. A court may order a convicted smuggler to pay restitution if the illegal alien smuggled qualifies as a victim under the Victim and Witness Protection Act. Conspiracy to commit crimes of sheltering, harboring, or employing illegal aliens is a separate federal offense punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or five years' imprisonment.

Enforcement

A person or entity having knowledge of a violation or potential violation of employer sanctions provisions may submit a signed written complaint to the INS office with jurisdiction over the business or residence of the potential violator, whether an employer, employee, or agent. The complaint must include the names and addresses of both the complainant and the violator, and detailed factual allegations, including date, time, and place of the potential violation, and the specific conduct alleged to be a violation of employer sanctions. By regulation, the INS will only investigate third-party complaints that have a reasonable probability of validity. Designated INS officers and employees, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws, may make an arrest for violation of smuggling or harboring illegal aliens.

State and local law enforcement officials have the general power to investigate and arrest violators of federal immigration statutes without prior INS knowledge or approval, as long as they are authorized to do so by state law. There is no extant federal limitation on this authority. The 1996 immigration control legislation passed by Congress was intended to encourage states and local agencies to participate in the process of enforcing federal immigration laws. Immigration officers and local law enforcement officers may detain an individual for a brief warrantless interrogation where circumstances create a reasonable suspicion that the individual is illegally present in the U.S. Specific facts constituting a reasonable suspicion include evasive, nervous, or erratic behavior; dress or speech indicating foreign citizenship; and presence in an area known to contain a concentration of illegal aliens. Hispanic appearance alone is not sufficient. Immigration officers and police must have a valid warrant or valid employer's consent to enter workplaces or residences. Any vehicle used to transport or harbor illegal aliens, or used as a substantial part of an activity that encourages illegal aliens to come to or reside in the U.S. may be seized by an immigration officer and is subject to forfeiture. The forfeiture power covers any conveyances used within the U.S.

RICO —Citizen Recourse

Private persons and entities may initiate civil suits to obtain injunctions and treble damages against enterprises that conspire to or actually violate federal alien smuggling, harboring, or document fraud statutes, under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO). The pattern of racketeering activity is defined as commission of two or more of the listed crimes. A RICO enterprise can be any individual legal entity, or a group of individuals who are not a legal entity but are associated in fact, and can include nonprofit associations.

Tax Crimes

Employers who aid or abet the preparation of false tax returns by failing to pay income or Social Security taxes for illegal alien employees, or who knowingly make payments using false names or Social Security numbers, are subject to IRS criminal and civil sanctions. U.S. nationals who have suffered intentional discrimination because of citizenship or national origin by an employer with more than three employees may file a complaint within 180 days of the discriminatory act with the Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, U.S. Department of Justice. In addition to the federal statutes summarized, state laws and local ordinances controlling fair labor practices, workers compensation, zoning, safe housing and rental property, nuisance, licensing, street vending, and solicitations by contractors may also apply to activities that involve illegal aliens.

Comment:

A comment and a published quote by Robert Gaffney, Attorney and County Executive of Suffolk County, LI, NY:

The statutory foundation of United States immigration law has always been the jurisdiction of the federal government, Congress and the federal courts. The preeminent laws concerning the employment of illegal aliens are found in the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. §~ 1101-1503), as amended by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 CIRCA).

The law states it is a crime to assist an illegal alien who lacks employment authorization by referring him to an employer, or by acting as his or her employer, or as an agent for an employer. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324a(a)(1)(A) (Lexis 1997). Furthermore, it is unlawful to hire an individual for employment without complying with the employment eligibility requirements for every person hired. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324a(a)(l)(B) (Lexis 1997). Moreover, conduct tending substantially to facilitate illegal aliens remaining in the United States illegally, where there is knowledge or a reckless disregard of an illegal alien s unlawful status, is a crime, with escalating penalties, encompassed within the provisions of 1324. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iii) (Lexis 1997); United States v. Kim. 193 F-3d 567 (2d Cir. 1999), are considered employees for purposes of immigration law.
6 posted on 04/17/2008 7:23:59 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; ...

Legal Workers Strike Back Ping!


7 posted on 04/19/2008 10:32:19 AM PDT by HiJinx (~ Support our Troops ~ www.americasupportsyou.mil ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
That seems a bit harsh if the company called ICE in the first place and asked for an investigation. Surely it is in the Union’s interest to help them oust the illegal aliens, not sue them.

Lawyers don't care about right and wrong just suing to get a cut of the pie.

8 posted on 04/19/2008 10:43:18 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

“Surely it is in the Union’s interest to help them oust the illegal aliens, not sue them.”

In many cases, the illegal aliens are union members and the unions justify their membership by stating that the unions themselves are “international” unions. If fact, when the Swift plants were raided, the meatcutters union was one of the first to cry foul and come to the aid of the families. Unions benefit when pay scales are lower for illegal aliens (and part time workers), but the union collects full union dues from those same workers. It’s also an excuse for unions to get rid of the older full-time members.


9 posted on 04/19/2008 10:55:23 AM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

I guess that figures. I haven’t had any dealings with unions for a long time, but my experience is that they are in it for themselves, not their members.


10 posted on 04/19/2008 10:59:54 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson