Posted on 04/18/2008 1:15:26 PM PDT by BenLurkin
Some folks should really stick to theology.
“Pope says unilateral acts undermine U.N.”
First, thank God they do undermine the UN which is far more wrong on things than they are right. They have to be forced and dragged kicking and screaming to do the right thing.
Second, I agree with the Pope’s statement, and my solution to it is to get rid of the UN altogether. Let the dictators and extremists and warlords and commies all form their own groups. Watch them circle-jerk each other to see who’s going to pony up the money they want for their globalist and selfish policies.
No, a broad consensus often weakens efforts to confront global problems.
Get a grip, Pope! I'm liking him less and less.
It is hard to believe this Pope could be so duped by the U.N. -— The sooner the U.N. is thrown out of the USA, the better.
Besides, as far as I am concerned the UN does not have ANY authority here.
Since the UN has no authority, what’s the big deal?
Looks like he’s just thrown a turd in the punchbowl of what was shaping up as a great trip.
Good. The UN has no authority.
and weaken the broad consensus needed to confront global problems...
WAKE UP! There IS no consensus within the UN at all.
The only thing that the UN can do is take money.
the pope also said the international community sometimes had the duty to intervene when a country could not protect its own people from “grave and sustained violations of human rights.”
WAKE UP! Millions of people have died - dead as a doornail - because the UN can not intervene anywhere, anytime, anyplace.
The present construct of the UN is fatally flawed and useless to protect anyone at all.
It cannot act, it cannot protect and it cannot provide.
He is too great a man to be naive. I'm stumped.
Before the U.N. can address its purposes and goals it must first be purged of members that are pure evil, by anyone's definition. Is the pontiff suggesting that we are obligated to have a dialog and compromise with the devil?
Dear Pope,
I know you are busy, but please take a moment to evaluate whether the U.N. has done ANYTHING positive in the last 20 years.
Get a grip, folks. This is al-Reuters.
If they were blabbing about Global Warming, would you take their reporting at face value?
If they were blabbing about Quagmire in Iraq, would you take their reporting at face value?
If they were blabbing about the Need for More Gun Control, would you take their reporting at face value?
Here's the complet address to the UN, posted four hours ago, with a grand total of nine replies.
A piece of drivel from al-Reuters about the address, though, gets dozens of replies.
al-Reuters is playing you ALL ... and you just slurp their stuff up.
Turn your brains on, read the entire address ... remember that it is directed to the UN ... not the US.
It looks like this Pope desires a new emphasis on “Liberation Theology.”
Are you surprised that the Pope is not an American first?
Whether it's Reuters or not, it's a FACT that the Pope has consistently been against the US invading Iraq.
Unilateral acts without first trying to gain support? perhaps. But acting upon a moral imperative when that august body demurs? Fair game. In that case it is the UN that undermines itself.
This however is nonsense:
"Since rights and the resulting duties follow naturally from human interaction, it is easy to forget that they are the fruit of a commonly held sense of justice built primarily upon solidarity among the members of society, and hence valid at all times and for all peoples."
Not all peoples are members of the same society. Different societies each have a different sense of justice.
I'm surprised he made such an obvious misstatement -- it represents dangerous wishful thinking on a grand scale.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.