Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xsrdx

To elaborate:
The M16/M4 platform is, unlike most calibers, suffers dramatic changes in performance when assorted factors vary. Barrel length is significant, as is twist rate, bullet weight, expansion/fragmentation behavior, velocity, etc. Seems it works quite well when all these factors are tuned correctly as required for certain needs ... but use the wrong parameters under certain conditions, and of course it doesn’t work as desired.

Biggest problem I can tell is the insistence on using “green tip” rounds on soft targets using short barrels. Use Mk262 and it works fine; use a lighter round that won’t yaw/fragment, well duh performance is sub-optimal.


105 posted on 04/21/2008 12:02:23 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
Biggest problem I can tell is the insistence on using “green tip” rounds on soft targets using short barrels.

The insistence on 1:7 twist, combined with lowered velocity and 62gr steel core pill, leads to subpar terminal performance.

Given M855 and 1:7 twist, the short barrel is a poor choice.

Additionally, the short gas system reduces available power to cycle the action compared to mid or full length gas systems.

109 posted on 04/21/2008 12:28:13 PM PDT by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson