Obamas Latest Flag Problem-Campaign Logo Has Arrow Piercing Flag

Free Republic ^ | April 22, 2008 | prayforpeaceofJerusalem

[Eva]

It’s not exactly subliminal. I didn’t see it at first but when I repeatedly loaded the web site, I slowed down my computer enough to see the seal.

I would bet that Obama is not aware of the presence of this seal, that it is the work of his tech guy. There was some mention of the tech guy having made radical remarks a few days ago. His name was something like Legget. I heard it on Rush, so I have never seen it written (could have been Hannity’s radio show).

[Eva]

Here's an article about the Obama tech advisor, as you can see , he is fully capable of planting this hidden symbol. -------------------------------

Obama Tech Advisor Introduces Video of Gay, Singing Jesus Who Gets Hit by a Bus

By Warner Todd Huston | April 21, 2008 - 02:21 ET Erick Erickson over at RedState tells us all of an anti-Christian video recently introduced with great frivolity by Internet philosopher and Obama technology advisor Larry Lessig. The video introduced at a Google Author series seminar shows Jesus singing the Gloria Gaynor tune "I Will Survive" in a very effeminate, theatrical way. As the song ramps up, Jesus throws off his robe and strips down to a diaper-like covering, then he sashays through a modern city until he gets hit by a bus in an intersection.

The worst thing about this is that this is also another scandal involving a Barack Obama campaign associate showing his disdain for the American mainstream, this time a disdain of Christianity. It turns out that Lessig is a somewhat secretive Obama campaign advisor, serving to assist the campaign on Internet and technology policies. As Erickson points out, Lessig hosts Obama's tech policy on his own lessig.org website.

At the conference, the Google employees can be heard laughing and enjoying the show. The clip ends with Lessig claiming that we shouldn't worry because a sequel shows that Jesus survives being run over by the bus. How comforting, eh?

Again, as Erickson points out, "Barack Obama's campaign has regularly cited Lessig as a key supporter on technology issues (see here too) and made sure Lessig was quoted when listing Obama's technology endorsers." <

Aside from his attacks on Jesus, Lessig is also an advocate of the concept of digital communism, a belief that there should be no such thing as intellectual property rights, that all creations of art or technology should be free for the taking.

So, what we have here is another close Obama supporter and advisor that seems to hate the things that the average American holds dear. The list of America hating Obama associates is getting longer every day, and now we can add a Christian hating, communist to that list.

It's really hard to believe that any real American can support a man for president of the United States of America who surrounds himself with people who so hate this country and all it stands for.

As heard on the Rush Limbaugh Show, April 21 at around noon (CT). Welcome Rush Limbaugh listeners.

Also as heard on the Sean Hannity radio Show, April 21 during his first hour. We got Hannitized, folks.

[longtermmemmory]

It is hard when anti americans don’t understand the rest of the country. They think all the country is NYC.

[prayforpeaceofJerusalem]

It is mind boggling to find out about the deep, deep roots Obama has into anarchist, communist, Islamist, Black Panther, Nation of Islam, Gay Agenda, societies.

I do not think this man with the Muslim father from Africa, who was a Muslim in his youth [and we know he has not renounced that] will ever be President of this great nation.
I do believe that he will inflict as much harm to this nation as he can, however. It remains to be seen what that is.....

[visualops]

I wasn't going to bother responding to your post since I don't generally like to waste my time with nonsense but I also don't like to see people blind themselves to reality. First of all, who Obama is and pretends to be and his dangerous agenda for America is one thing, and his website is quite another.
Low resolution (72dpi) images that are highly compressed have alot of what is called artifacts, which are distortions that appear around elements of the image. Artifacts will distort the appearance of lettering, and add to that an image that has been inverted and colorized and voila, you get an E that very vaguely resembles a Z or L. That slight ambiguity coupled with someone who is already convinced there are many things wrong with an image and it becomes self-fulfilling that you see what you want to see.
I took the original background image (I don't want an image that someone else has "enhanced" because they may introduce more inaccuracies). I resampled the image to enlarge it using Altamira Group's Genuine Fractals filter (in Photoshop) which is one of the better algorithms for lossless enlargement. I then applied only one effect which is to burn shadows. The reason we burn shadows rather than for instance increase contrast is because we don't want to artificially lighten any part which contrast will do. We just want to enhance the shadows to give the letter it's original definition.
You can see in my image the 2 darkest spot are naturally the 2 main dark parts of an E, the areas above and below the center stem. The center stem is short but visible. You can also see the lightest parts out to the right correspond to and form the upper and lower arms of the E, and the center clearly shows the straight back of an E and not the slant of a Z.
The 3 trailing light areas to the left must be dismissed because they are all the same tone. A Z would have a leftward arm as strong or close to the the bottom rightward arm. A Z would also not have the shadows where they are.
It's an E.



The fact is there are plenty of issues to get riled up over and go after Obama for. Trying to say that their web designer purposefully put "Z Pluribus Unum" is not one of them. It just makes you appear foolish.

[prayforpeaceofJerusalem]

Where is the rest of the “Pluribus Unum” to go with your “E”? I asked you for the whole phrase done equally and together, as on other web pages where they did so, and where the “E” shows itself to be not an “E” but a “Z’ while the “Pluribus Unum” lettering remains entirely clear and unchanged.
Anyone can do anything with an isolated letter, but the letter as you tweaked it with the “Pluribus Unum” is what I asked you for, to make your opinion credible. -And also, to be credible, take a real “E” with the “Pluribus Unum”, from a Government page, and do the same tweaking, to prove you are not the one just seeing what you want to see. But ya gotta do the entire phrase, to be believed, and the “Pluribus Unum” must remain as clear as it does on all the enlarged enhancements while the “E” is a “Z”.

The entire image, as it comes up in the subliminal fashion on Obama’s web pages, is intended to convey a definite - and not accidental- message, which has been discussed already here and on the web, on other forums.

[visualops]

Anyone can do anything with an isolated letter

There is only one letter in question.

do the entire phrase, to be believed,

If you aren't going to believe I am honest there is no point continuing this discussion.

[prayforpeaceofJerusalem]

You have only convinced me that the letter in question was so designed by a clever graphics person as to present itself as a “Z”, on purpose.
You want to believe that the design presents the letter as an “E”, and by faulty design of the designer, instead presents itself as a “Z” not only to discerning eyes on a good computer screen, but to all eyes when enhanced and greyscaled, as others did to the entire phrase. It says; “Z Pluribus Unum”.

[caridaway]

The bird is a phoenix which is a symbol of resurrection as is the letter “z” meaning alpha omega, the beginning and the end. Z also means weapon or destroyer. The bird is holding an arrow and seems to be dominating the symbol of the world below. Doesn’t look good. These symbols aren’t just cute little artistic fancies. Obama is well aware of their meanings. Z pluribus unum means- greek “I, alpha-omega”, Phoenician, “the destroyer”, from the multitudes. A bit egocentric and scary wouldn’t you say, for someone claiming to be for the people? But then the fasces symbol has been used by all governments since the begining of our enslavement. That is where the word fascist comes from. It’s nothing new.

[Eva]

Whatever happened to this? I don’t understand why this doesn’t concern anyone.

[icwhatudo]

The Eagle in retreat was brushed of as simply an Eagle facing a different way, the pierced flag was brushed off as “standard” (a pole with a sharp top with a flag wrapped around it).

[savedbygrace]

That’s not an eagle; it’s a parrot. Or maybe a goose. Look at it hard for a few seconds until you see the parrot/goose.

(Hint: The parrot’s/goose’s head is what’s supposed to be the eagle’s right wing.)

[Eva]

Why doesn’t the eagle have a white head and why are the olive branches dropped? Did they answer that?

[nottoodumb]

It’s a phoenix. Occultic symbol of the antichrist. Read about it here:
http://tinyurl.com/5essds