Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colt's grip on military rifle criticized
AP ^ | 20 April 08 | RICHARD LARDNER

Posted on 04/23/2008 1:17:21 PM PDT by LSUfan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: RKV

The site of manufacture is important. I agree with that. But the country of origin for the design or company is less important in my book.

All the Marine Corps’ M16A4s are made by FN, a Belgian company, in South Carolina.

To me, the most important factor is that our troops get the best weapon available.

That hasn’t happened since our GIs went to war with M1 Garands in 1942.


21 posted on 04/23/2008 1:57:36 PM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
High precision machined parts don’t come cheap

Other than the barrel and the bolt what part would that be???

22 posted on 04/23/2008 1:59:00 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Here is a RETAIL Colt M4 selling for LESS than the US military pays!

http://dynamicarmament.com/items/long-guns~shotguns/colt/colt-m4-carbine-223-16-blk-ctle6920-detail.htm


23 posted on 04/23/2008 2:05:57 PM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
"Seems like $1500 when you buy 400,000 of them is pretty lousy pricing...But, hey, I could be wrong."

And you would be, Colt can sell it's carbine to police (not private citizens) for $1,699 because the government is buying in bulk.

When I bought my AR15, about thirty years ago, they were cheaper - and so was gasoline.

I've watched this dance over costs of aircraft procured by the government - 'rip off' is a cornerstone of USG dogma - it's not true.

MANY years ago, and just for chuckles, a group of us obtained the USG specs for the $600.00 ash tray then being trumpeted: Of course you could have purchased an ash tray for $2.95 but if you followed the AF requirements they got a deal.

On the other hand, a piston system you could pin onto an existing receiver sounds like a really nifty upgrade.

24 posted on 04/23/2008 2:11:35 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

Exactly right, all for PC crap, which existed then too! At the Infantry Museum at Ft. Benning, I always stop by the display case with the Chauchat for a good laugh. One time there were some local HS boys and let me tell you, those kids knew their military history. It was great listening to 16-17 year olds talk about the Chauchat and they brought up the Browning (BAR) issue as well as the .303 Lewis gun, also not used properly because of politics rather than good common sense.

Even more delightful was when one of them brought up the fact about Al Gore being against every successful weapon’s development (Bradley Fighting Vehicle, Abrams M1 tank, body armor—the list is long), great kids!


25 posted on 04/23/2008 2:19:50 PM PDT by brushcop (B-Co. 2/69 3rd Infantry Div., "Sledgehammer!" ...and keep hammering 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: norton

http://dynamicarmament.com/items/long-guns~shotguns/colt/colt-m4-carbine-223-16-blk-ctle6920-detail.htm

Should retail be LESS than what DOD pays?


26 posted on 04/23/2008 2:22:10 PM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Made and manufactured here in the USA. 100% of it. We just cannot afford to be beholden to another government for our primary weapons.

HK and FN both have subsidiaries in the US. The guns will be made in the US.

27 posted on 04/23/2008 2:38:31 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

So was/is that piece of crap jam-in-the-sand Barretta but we were still issued that crap for way too long.


28 posted on 04/23/2008 2:40:26 PM PDT by SERE_DOC (Todays politicians living proof why we need have a second amendment to the constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
The lower receiver is mil-spec machined aluminum is one example....
29 posted on 04/23/2008 3:37:59 PM PDT by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: norton

Piston has to be dialed in, and has to stay dialed in, or it jams too.

My Bushie ARs run fine, all day long, but the fit and finish of the Colt is better. I’d pay 15 for a Colt if I didn’t already have the Bushmasters for 12.

Wet and dirty runs a LOT better than dry and dirty.


30 posted on 04/23/2008 4:11:18 PM PDT by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
The carbine you cite is NOT mil standard and costs more than those procured for the military...so what's wrong with that picture?

You and the police alike can buy black guns for less than you might because the military contracts drive costs down due to volume...conversely, there are market influences as well; if people want 'em, the price will not go down until supply outstrips demand.

But the point seems to be that the government price, in hight quantities, is below that charged to police for lower performing weapons.

31 posted on 04/23/2008 4:57:05 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: norton

No sir.

The only difference between this weapon and the DOD weapon is that this one is not selective fire. This Colt M4 costs LESS at RETAIL than the DOD is paying for their M4s.

http://dynamicarmament.com/items/long-guns~shotguns/colt/colt-m4-carbine-223-16-blk-ctle6920-detail.htm


32 posted on 04/23/2008 5:13:49 PM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

Repost. There are a couple of big threads on this from a few days ago.


33 posted on 04/23/2008 5:57:32 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (<===Non-bitter, Gun-totin', Typical White American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
I'm interested in the KRISS .45 cal system of re-vectoring recoil down instead of back into the shooters shoulder. This may have some real benefits in using larger caliber rounds and still maintaining control on rounds going down-range.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

34 posted on 04/23/2008 6:02:38 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brushcop
That's nothing. it run in the family. When Al Gore Sr was in congress he voted against appropriations for the B-24 Liberator and the B-29 Superfortress....two of the most successful bomber designs in aviation history. We could not have won WWII without either of them.



35 posted on 04/23/2008 6:28:35 PM PDT by Emperor Palpatine ("There is no civility, only politics.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Five bucks?

There is a huge difference between a select fire carbine and a one pull-one round sporter...pistol grip & telescoping stock or not.

There is also a huge difference in the profit one shop might be willing to take versus another shop - but you knew that.

36 posted on 04/23/2008 11:51:56 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
The only difference between this weapon and the DOD weapon is that this one is not selective fire. This Colt M4 costs LESS at RETAIL than the DOD is paying for their M4s.

Go to the annual National Match at Camp Perry and watch the civilian shooters with AR15s swapping out their commercial parts for MilSpec GI components where possible and legal, everything from GI match barrels to the GI 5-coil extractor springs instead of the 4-coil commercial ones. There's a lot more to the cost of a military contract item than that of the unit itself, including the cost of the inspection and acceptance process [I was an inspector on Ruger Security-Six revolvers purchased for DOD base security guards; one in three failed initial inspection] maintenance and future spare parts availibility contracts, and product engineering and development cost compensation.

37 posted on 04/25/2008 7:09:59 AM PDT by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson