Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alexander the Great's "Crown," Shield Discovered?
National Geographic News ^ | 4-23-2008 | Sara Goudarzi

Posted on 04/25/2008 7:11:55 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Perdogg
How much did one of those ancient battle swords weigh ?

Probably not as much as one might think. I'm not an expert, but I have been reading up on the development of the sword. For the medieval age, a viking sword would've been about two or two and a half pounds, and even a big two-handed norman longsword would've only tipped the scale at between three and four pounds. Maybe six for a really big one. The big German GrosseMesser (big knife) was only about four pounds and it was a fairly imposing chunk of steel.

I don't know for sure about all pre-BC era swords, and I haven't studied the Macedonians/Greeks/Romans yet, but I'd be suprised if they weren't similar. The Roman gladius was quite short and light and fast.

Movies like to show big, heavy (10-15lb) monster swords like Conan's but most weren't like that. In actual combat a sword like that would have been slow and cumbersome. A soldier needs something that he could swing repeatedly without exhaustion, and something that would be quick and nimble to handle.

I've done some exercises with a 2.5 lb viking sword... and it's quite a workout. It's the speed that makes the thing. It would challenge anyone to swing one through a series of cuts for more than 15 minutes before your arm feels like its gonna fall off.

21 posted on 04/26/2008 9:02:52 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam
I've always been skeptical of the idea that Alexander was gay (or bi?) but seeing this "crown" well, makes me wonder...


22 posted on 04/26/2008 9:39:59 AM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

really cool information about the dynamics of change in art. I love little bits of historical trivia like this.

Thanks for the post.


23 posted on 04/26/2008 9:47:50 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

So where’s the sceptre pic?


24 posted on 04/26/2008 9:48:55 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
It was always my under standing that Ptolemy, Alexanders half brother took his body to Alexandria where it remained entombed for many centuries.

I understand that Caesar Augustrus vitied the tomb and left an imperial standard as tribute.

The Ptolemaic dynast survived for many years, ending in Cleopatra who was the end of the lineage.

25 posted on 04/26/2008 3:24:50 PM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

They can use that DNA to reproduce another Alexander.


26 posted on 04/26/2008 7:26:33 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ramius; SunkenCiv

Conan the Barbarian is one of my favorite movies. They are in the process of remaking the movie due for a May 2009 release.

Gerald Butler would be my choice for Conan but the producers say that he will be a relative unknown.


27 posted on 04/27/2008 4:34:43 PM PDT by Perdogg (Four years of Carter gave us 29 years of Iran; What will Hilabama give us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Oh-kay. :’) I’ve seen that Arnold one (James Earl Jones was also in it), and was gravely disappointed. Of course, now, the budget could be better, and there will doubtless be loads of CGI enhancement — all that’s needed is a better script.


28 posted on 04/27/2008 5:05:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Sword weight... I just saw this, and should have checked before replying, in case the question has been answered. Sword weight varied; bronze swords tended to be massive and short, because they were more of a chopping weapon than a thrusting weapon. One old story involves a Spartan warrior who complained that his sword was too short. His mother upbraided him with the reply, “take a step forward, then it will be long enough.” Iron (and later steel) swords were longer and narrower, and were more versatile and effective.

The spears used (for example) by hoplites were thrusting weapons, but on occasion were used in a more club-like fashion. Javelins were thrown weapons. Alex’s dad Philip innovated a number of things, most significantly with his infantry (spear length was increased, with rear rows keeping theirs raised to protect the formation from projectiles, and front five rows straight ahead) and with the introduction of “belly shooters” and integrated cavalry. Alexander grew up in all that, which is probably one of the reasons he was such a success.


29 posted on 04/27/2008 5:13:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson