Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sweep of polygamists' kids raises legal questions [Children of Monogamous FLDS also taken]
AP ^ | 04 25 08 | MICHELLE ROBERTS

Posted on 04/25/2008 8:38:08 PM PDT by Howdy there

The state of Texas made a damning accusation when it rounded up 462 children at a polygamous sect's ranch: The adults are forcing teenage girls into marriage and sex, creating a culture so poisonous that none should be allowed to keep their children.

But the broad sweep - from nursing infants to teenagers - is raising constitutional questions, even in a state where authorities have wide latitude for taking a family's children.

Church members said that not all of them practice polygamy, and some form traditional nuclear families. One sect member whose teenage son is now in foster care testified that she is a divorced single mother.Snip

CPS officials have conceded there is no evidence the youngest children were abused, and about 130 of the children are under 5. Teenage boys were not physically or sexually abused either, according to evidence presented in a custody hearing earlier last week, but more than two dozen teenage boys are also in state custody, now staying at a boys' ranch that might typically house troubled or abandoned teens. Snip

Two teenage girls are pregnant, and although identities and ages have been difficult to nail down, CPS officials say no more than 30 minor girls in state custody have children.

Snip

Constitutional experts say U.S. courts have consistently held that a parent's beliefs alone are not grounds for removal.

Snip

One FLDS member who did testify said she and her husband and their three children form a traditional family and live in a separate house from other sect members. An FLDS expert who testified at the hearing and a former member of the sect say only about half the marriages in the sect are polygamous.

Snip

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: flds; jeffs; ploygamy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-360 next last

1 posted on 04/25/2008 8:38:09 PM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howdy there

Oh well, there is that...

WTG CPS, saving the children that don’t need saving over four hundred at a time...

Ouch!


2 posted on 04/25/2008 8:42:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (McCain is a poison pill. Accept it! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2006492/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howdy there

Maybe there’s a reason why a real valid complainant should be involved in such raids.


3 posted on 04/25/2008 8:43:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (McCain is a poison pill. Accept it! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2006492/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howdy there

Trying to pass an email off as news. LOL


4 posted on 04/25/2008 8:44:19 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Email??


5 posted on 04/25/2008 8:46:50 PM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howdy there
My problem with accepting where you are coming from is that to me it's not imaginable. I have mixed feelings about CPS but they do have a job to do. As arrogant as they can be sometimes I just can't imagine this district working independently here. I can't imagine a judge saying “ok, where do I sign the warrant”? It was probably more like “you want to do what?!!!”. There had to be networking between leaders all over the state and enough evidence to give CPS the ok.IMO
6 posted on 04/25/2008 8:49:51 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I got an AP article at the link. To what email are you referring?


7 posted on 04/25/2008 8:51:57 PM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
I can't imagine a judge saying “ok, where do I sign the warrant”?

This is the same judge who stupidly asked the LDS come in and "supervise" the FLDS while they pray.

8 posted on 04/25/2008 8:52:42 PM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howdy there

Too bad this has already been tried in the press.


9 posted on 04/25/2008 8:52:52 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"WTG CPS, saving the children that don’t need saving over four hundred at a time..."

Dangerous ground being broken here for sure.

10 posted on 04/25/2008 8:53:28 PM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

We are to take your children!


11 posted on 04/25/2008 8:53:54 PM PDT by 386wt (Be free and don't die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howdy there
Ah, who was she gonna ask...Baptists? She and CPS are trying to accommodate as much as possible IMO. Would an individual family, receive this much leeway? You know they wouldn't.
12 posted on 04/25/2008 8:56:16 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg; UCANSEE2
My problem with accepting where you are coming from....

Here is where I am coming from.

CPS, follow the rule of law.

FLDS, follow the rule of law.

Judge Walther, follow the rule of law.

13 posted on 04/25/2008 8:58:06 PM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 386wt

You will have to take me first!


14 posted on 04/25/2008 8:58:23 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Why does a judge think he or she has the authority to tell ANYONE that they can not pray UNLESS they have a supervisor that SHE approves of?


15 posted on 04/25/2008 8:59:06 PM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Howdy there

My understanding is that this is now a Civil matter, not a criminal case. Reading between the lines that is why no arrests have been made nor are there likely to be any arrests. In a Civil case there is no presumption of innocence and the defendants have to testify and prove their innocence. Of course in a Civil Case the perps aren’t going to go to jail either.

I think the next question that should be asked is, is home schooling child abuse? There seems to be little difference between that and indoctrination which seems to be the primary charge in this case.


16 posted on 04/25/2008 9:02:05 PM PDT by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howdy there
If Texas messed up the families will sue , heads will roll and it will make protecting rights even stronger

If the state didn't though, we need to be righteously angry at the people who put us in a position of defending our rights to congregate. We'll have to watch the congress close. They may want to do stupid stuff like registering and limiting households.

17 posted on 04/25/2008 9:04:17 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
If Texas messed up the families will sue ,

And in the meantime?

The children?

18 posted on 04/25/2008 9:06:09 PM PDT by Howdy there
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
You will have to take me first!

Waco isn't just a town in Texas.

It's a template.
19 posted on 04/25/2008 9:06:47 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
If Texas messed up the families will sue , heads will roll and it will make protecting rights even stronger

It depends on what the qualified immunity statues are in Texas.

Both sides are wrong.

No cheers, unfortunately -- and prayers up for *all* the families, in *both* senses of they prayer.

20 posted on 04/25/2008 9:06:52 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-360 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson