Posted on 04/27/2008 6:08:04 PM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So
So, 4000 rubes are dead. Cry me the Tigris. Another 30,000 have been seriously wounded. Boo #ucking hoo. They got what they asked for—and cool robotic limbs, too.
Likely, just reading the above paragraph made you uncomfortable. But why?
The benevolence of America’s “troops” is sacrosanct. Questioning their rectitude simply isn’t done. It’s the forbidden zone. We may rail against this tragic war, but our soldiers are lauded by all as saints. Why? They volunteered to partake in this savage idiocy, and for this they deserve our utmost respect? I think not.
The nearly two-thirds of us who know this war is bullshit need to stop sucking off the troops. They get enough action raping female soldiers and sodomizing Iraqi detainees. The political left is intent on “supporting” the troops by bringing them home, which is a good thing. But after rightly denouncing the administration’s lies and condemning this awful war, relatively sensible pundits—like Keith Olbermann—turn around and lovingly praise the soldiers’ brave service to the country. Why?
What service are they providing? I don’t remember ordering 300,000 dead Iraqis—although I was doing a lot of heavy narcotics back in ‘03. Our soldiers are not providing a service to the country, they’re providing a service to a criminal administration and their oil company cronies. When a mafia don orders a hit, is the assassin absolved of personal responsibility when it’s carried out? Of course not. What if the hit man was fooled into service? We’d all say, “Tough shit, you dumb Guido,” then lock him up and throw away the key.
As a society, we need to discard our blind deference to military service. There’s nothing admirable about volunteering to murder people. There’s nothing admirable about being rooked by obvious propaganda. There’s nothing admirable about doing what you’re told if what you’re told to do is terrible.
We all learned recently that the Bush administration instituted its policy of global torture during quaint White House meetings. And we already know this war was started with lies. Shame on them. But what about the people who physically carry out these atrocities? We’ve seen bad apples punished and CEO despots walk free, but all verbal and written denouncement is focused on our leaders. Surely, they deserve that and more—decapitation, really. But why can’t we be critical of the people who have actually tortured and murdered hundreds of thousands of Iraqi citizens? We deride private contractors like Blackwater for similar conduct—why are the troops blameless?
Take John McCain, or “McNasty,” as they called him in high school. While the conventional wisdom says that Obama gets a pass from the media, McCain is clearly the least scrutinized presidential candidate. He diddles lobbyists, sings about bombing Iran and doesn’t know Shiite from Shinola, yet he remains unscathed, cloaked in his Vietnam “hero” legend.
Again, what is heroic about involving one’s self in a foolish war, being a shitty pilot or getting tortured? Yeah, it must have sucked, but getting your ass kicked every day for five years doesn’t make you a hero—it makes you a Bad News Bear.
Here’s where America’s military lust becomes a true perversion. If we truly valued military prowess, John McCain would be viewed as a failure. But duty alone is enough to inspire our gratitude. Hence the left’s tendency to obligatorily praise the troops while decrying the sum of their actions. Good thing, too, because this war is unwinnable.
George Washington warned that the biggest threat to the young United States was in keeping and deploying standing armies. An overextended military is a drain on any nation—eventually it will break. It also pisses off the people your army is standing on. We’ll never heed this warning and break the cycle of violence, so long as military service is so reflexively praised.
People want to be respected. And in a country with an abysmal education system and disappearing economic opportunities, they seek respect wherever they can find it—as street corner toughs or as government-sanctioned thugs. It beats McDonald’s. But this kind of victim-of-circumstance-sympathy for the troops turns them into automatons, neither deserving of praise or damnation. Disregarding the Stop Loss back door draft travesty, they had a choice.
We’re a squeamish people; we eschew heated debates and, in principle, strive for political correctness when arguing with those who hold contrary views. The left does anyway; the right makes no such pretense. That’s one of the reasons liberals have taken such a beating in the last few decades.
As plainly stupid as religious belief or participating in immoral and illegal wars may be, the castrated left can only argue against these things by appealing to reason. In America, that fails every time. We respond best to partisan venom and ad hominem attacks.
The right has no problem painting their opponents as cowards or godless heathens, but liberals—instead of sticking to the merits of their arguments—fight those accusations by leaning right, praising god and guns, and pandering to the people who cling to them. The left has taken to appeasing bullies as their only course to victory. And that’s no victory at all.
Liberals need to start calling a moron a moron—and openly mocking that moron if his positions or actions are indefensible. Just as Limbaugh or Hannity insults the left, tilting the battlefield so liberals are left scrounging for their patriotic bona fides, the left must begin attacking stupidity whether in the form of religious nonsense, “free market” capitalism or military worship.
Instead of blowing the troops every chance we get, to prove our patriotism and insulate ourselves against attacks from the right, liberals should grow a pair and start dishing the damnation.
How despicable must a military campaign be before Americans turn on their beloved troops? After chiding the “War on Toddlers” as fool-headed and pointlessly barbaric, would Keith Olbermann still thank the troops for their service? After the “Great Grandmother Slaughter of 2010,” will the press remove the fat military cock from its mouth? Following “Operation Murder Fluffy Kittens,” will the left finally nix the “honored service” crap? No. No, they won’t.
Condemning the “troops”—a term coined during the Gulf War—is almost unthinkable. And it won’t win you any awards. “Troops” are a monolithic entity, a cohesive group of pride-inspiring order-takers. Whereas an individual soldier is accountable for his or her actions, the “troops” are too abstract to blame. For Americans, there are only bad apples, never bad orchards.
But what kind of world would we rather live in: one where fools are admired for being fooled and murderers are extolled for murdering, or one where we have the capacity to step back and say, “I don’t care who told you to do what and why; you’re still an asshole!” Personally, I’d rather live in a world where people who act like retards are treated like retards: executed in Texas.
Americans fear the truth. It’s the slipperiest slope of all. Once we start extending responsibility beyond those who gave orders to those who took them, it won’t be long before we’re blaming ourselves. And we can’t have that.
Well, guess what, kids? The Iraq debacle is a pointless bloodbath—and every time you applaud those who “bravely” fill that tub, you’re soaking in it.
Hat tip to Ace Of Spades
I vote we remove this POS’s US citizenship and deport him to the Communist hell hole of his choice.
So what’s Ian Murphy’s handle over at DU?
This pretty much says it all.
I suspected this...
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
As for this author - he needs to spend 5 years living in a islamic society. When (if) he comes back to the west, he will without any prodding worship the freedoms these soldiers work so hard to defend...
Hippies were contained when it was kosher to kick their ass when they got out of hand.
The litigious society we’ve become has emboldened them.
Fudgepacker I'm guessing.
“There’s nothing admirable about doing what you’re told if what you’re told to do is terrible.”
Has this guy never worked before?
Could I have a minute alone with “Mr.” Murphy?
Of course not, he sits on his *ss and siphons off the taxpayers.
Just a guess, but I’m willing to bet we’ll see little commie Ian in Denver this summer crying like a baby after getting a large dose of pepper spray and smacked with a baton back into reality. No justice- no peace! Let the games begin.
Ian is damn lucky he’s far, far away from me.
My head was about to explode but that particular phrase helped me put this A$$holes opinion in perspective.
How do jerk offs such as this find themselves with an audience at all?
What’s his DUmp name?
Me too, but isn’t there a lot of military in upstate NY?
I saw a pic of his ugly mug. He looks like a white suburban wannabe tough guy who’d get his ass kicked in less than a round.
This is the opinion of the majority of the American Sheep.
Doom on him and all who walk with him....
L
That’s what I am thinking too.
Just a liberal stating their true feelings, unlike those phonies who say they support the troops but condemn the war.
Isn't there anyone else on FR who remembers, or are they all a bunch of young whippersnappers??
If you can find the photo, please post it.
Doom on him and all who walk with him....
BTW, Mr Murphy apparently lives in Buffalo NY. L
I got no farther than the word ‘rube’ before I dismissed this guy out of hand.
Our armed forces are not made up of country hicks. This the the most well educated fighting force our nation has fielded. These folks weren’t out standing behind a mule three weeks before being inducted into the service. Many of them have degrees, or entered the military to be able to earn one after their service is completed. They are not stupid, or easily duped.
There’s another point that strikes me as being pertinant. I don’t think I’m the only one who has herd the term ‘rube’ used in a racist connotation. As it was used above, it makes me ponder if a secondary point this writer wanted to make without outright saying it, was that these folks are carrying water for the evil Joooos.
This guy is a nut-job.
author said it all with brief history of himself.
It seems odd that they charge those who defend our nation as being ‘baby killers’, but they hold abortionists in such high esteem.
It’s simply time to revoke his first amendment privileges. He obviously doesn’t value the 1st amendment enough to support those that protect it for him.
And the pepper spray.
Another angry, bitter liberal. They are so common these days.
Typical Marxist university programmed tool. There are hundreds of thousands of college students who undergo this indoctrnation each year, from Obama type communist professor friends.
Most successfully resist the indoctrination. The weaker brains become democrats. A few dim bulbs like this monster drink the full Kool-Aid dose, rotting their brains into permanent dementia.
No...I want to teach him some manners as well.
""You go into these large cities in the Northeast and, like a lot of large cities in the Northeast, common sense and patriotism has been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced love of country. And they've been brain dead through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these brain dead are gonna regenerate brain cells and they have not."
"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to government or narcotics or antipathy to God fearing people who aren't like them or anti-military sentiment or anti-American sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
Get in on the fun.
This has to part of the Rovian Plan to paint the Democrats as America-hating, Christian-bashing, Troop-despising far left creeps. It can’t be real.
Homosexual. They’re obsessed with sex, and hate themselves, thus have to lash out at others. I’ll bet $10 he’s gay.
Because their puny little existence fails.
That's why they need the government to cover for their inability to lead productive lives.
I would trade 4 million of this "man's" drug addled kind to have spared Staff Sgt. Matt Maupin.
No chance I'll take that bet because you're likely 100% spot on.
If you just want to teach him manners, then you go first.
That’ll make my “discussion” easier.
Hasn’t he noticed that Bin Ladin’s called nothing off??
Thanks for the warning. Just like this (expletive deleted) to spread viruses.
Mr. Murphy has certainly made any number of lists of People to See. He’s on mine, but he’s a little out of my range.
Nope, this is how they really are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.