Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fraud Daylight
IBD ^ | April 28, 2008

Posted on 04/28/2008 5:16:09 PM PDT by Kaslin

Elections: The Supreme Court got it right Monday in ruling 6-3 (with even liberal John Paul Stevens agreeing) that states are free to require voters to produce photo identification at the polls.


Everyone in the country should be pleased with the news. But, of course, not everyone is. It's almost as if some are disturbed that the ruling will make it harder to commit voter fraud.

The American Civil Liberties Union, for instance. It was the ACLU's suit against the state of Indiana over its requirement that voters need to produce a photo ID at the polls that led to the Supreme Court case.

Ken Falk, the organization's Indiana legal director, said he was "extremely disappointed" by the decision. It is the position of the ACLU that ID laws place a burden on voters, and the right to vote, Falk says, "is the most important right."

The right to vote cannot be found in the Constitution, so we're not sure from what source Falk is drawing his legal opinion. Best we can tell, voting is a privilege. Important, yes, but it's far more important that our elections are free — or as free as possible — of fraud.

Democrats still nursing their wounds from the 2000 presidential election mess — which they engineered when they brought in the lawyers — should be the first ones demanding legitimate elections. But they're not.

(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: aclu; photoid; scotus; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Kaslin

Now if we can add a provision for inked stained fingers for each voter, we might have some real progress. I can see these issues becoming state initiatives for the voters in the near future because the Dem legislators won’t let most states pass these bills.


21 posted on 04/28/2008 7:47:43 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Which three morons voted it was unconstitutional to require ID? Ginsberg, Souter? Just guessing.


22 posted on 04/28/2008 8:09:40 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Oregon has pure vote (fraud) by mail. Washington seeing how well it’s worked to turn a fragile balance into a Dem bastion is implementing it too, even though the law doesn’t require it. County Clerks have an “option” to run elections that way, so they do.

When I was getting my license 1/2 the people there were using all sorts of bizzare foreign docs to show who they were. They were all asked if they had filled out the voter card. The idiots at the DMV didn’t even bother to mention “if you are a citizen”.

So motor voter has done it’s work here in the NW and the elections are full of fraud. We demonstrated this in the last Gov. election, but we still ended up with the socialist bitch who stole it, not the legitimate winner.

Voting is getting to be a waste of time.


23 posted on 04/28/2008 8:12:53 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess the Supremes are going to stop playing straight man to the ACLU’s jokes.


24 posted on 04/28/2008 8:22:53 PM PDT by Defiant (McCain's big vein drains mainly from his brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson