Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XR7
There's got to be a better way. . . Nobody wants sex offenders around.

Wow. That sounds really complicated.

2 posted on 04/30/2008 9:12:01 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake

“He is a Level 3 — high risk for reoffending. He is not deemed so dangerous, or his crimes so serious, that he qualifies to be locked up longer.”

Good Lord....where does one begin?
He’s at high risk for reoffending-but it’s a crime not so serious or dangerous,so let’s let him out again-to reoffend.
It’s a not-so-serious crime-unless you’re the young victim.
It’s a not-so-dangerous crime-unless the young victim’s father or mother finds you and sends you to hell where you belong.
There....that’s better. NOW it makes a little more sense.


10 posted on 04/30/2008 9:17:08 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Liberals act as if stupidity were a virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake

“There’s got to be a better way. . . Nobody wants sex offenders around.”

Yes, there is a better way. Zip him into the sleeping bag and put him at the very top of the bridge.


78 posted on 04/30/2008 1:49:37 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson