To: coloradan
It sounds more like a leaky flip-flop.
Yes - I think so. Though (1) I'm not sure why you say "leaky" (I haven't noticed any claims that the device "leaks" state over time), and (2) it's
substantially smaller in size and power needs than a
single transistor, whereas a flip-flop requires five or ten transistors (I'm not sure exactly), and (3) it keeps state while powered entirely off.
19 posted on
04/30/2008 7:38:04 PM PDT by
ThePythonicCow
(By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
To: ThePythonicCow
I said leaky because it will conduct the “wrong” way, it’s just not so good at doing so. (And, if I understand correctly, if you keep doing that it trains to go that way). A flip-flop requires but two transistors, and if you make it with MOSFETS (ideally, with infinite gate resistance) the thing can remember its state on power-down - essentially nonvolatile memory.
30 posted on
04/30/2008 9:10:16 PM PDT by
coloradan
(The US is becoming a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson