Skip to comments.
South Carolina Governor Sanford vs. SC Lawmakers On Immigration Bill
WSPA-TV ^
| May 02, 2008
| AP
Posted on 05/02/2008 6:45:56 AM PDT by Clear Rivers

((The bill allows for fines as high as $10,000 when an employer knowingly hires an illegal immigrant. Sanford says federal law won't allow fines that range that high.))
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) - South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford says the Senate's illegal immigration bill has penalties that can't be enforced by the state.
Sanford says he will consider vetoing the bill if changes aren't made.
Senators passed a bill Wednesday that allows for fines as high as $10,000 when an employer knowingly hires an illegal immigrant. Sanford says federal law won't allow the state to impose fines that range that high.
The South Carolina Chamber of Commerce says it supports the penalties.
SC Senate leader says governor using Nazi-style propaganda tactic
The leader of the South Carolina Senate says Governor Sanford is using Nazi-style propaganda tactics in his disagreement with lawmakers.
Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell said yesterday that Sanford is practicing --quote-- "Goebbels-style journalism" by making assertions believable simply because he repeats them over and over.
Josef Goebbels was Adolf Hitler's propaganda minister.
Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer says a comparison like that is absolutely uncalled for and the governor thinks McConnell owes South Carolina's Jewish community an apology.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: aliens; carolina; immigrantlist; immigration; law; sanford
Oh wellllll.
To: Clear Rivers
Sooooo, I wonder who IS ensuring the meat packers in SC is getting their monies worth for the campaign contributions they have made?????
2
posted on
05/02/2008 6:48:06 AM PDT
by
MCCRon58
(Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who do neither, criticize.)
To: Clear Rivers
Gee. And I had high hopes for this guy.
3
posted on
05/02/2008 6:49:08 AM PDT
by
fweingart
(It doesn't matter who you vote for, the government always gets in!)
To: Clear Rivers
Since when does the Fed tell states how high a fine can be?
4
posted on
05/02/2008 6:49:43 AM PDT
by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
To: fweingart
Don’t get off the bus yet. It sounds like that if they can resolve the conflict with Federal law about the fines, he’d pass it. Sanford’s no Pandsey Graham.
What I can’t figure out is when Glenn McConnell went off his meds. That’s a REPUBLICAN backstabbing Sanford. When I lived down there, McConnell was a pretty stand-up guy. I can’t figure out why he’d invoke Godwin’s Law (an automatic loss of any argument, as any Internet nerd knows) and start name-dropping Nazis when talking about Sanford.
}:-)4
5
posted on
05/02/2008 6:52:36 AM PDT
by
Moose4
(http://moosedroppings.wordpress.com -- Because 20 million self-important blogs just aren't enough.)
To: Clear Rivers
The bill allows for fines as high as $10,000 when an employer knowingly hires an illegal immigrant.
That’s just so wrong. The employer should be deported since he obviously has no loyalty to the US.
6
posted on
05/02/2008 6:55:13 AM PDT
by
freedomfiter2
(It's too bad I've already promised myself to never vote for McCain.)
To: Clear Rivers
7
posted on
05/02/2008 7:04:34 AM PDT
by
Andy'smom
To: Clear Rivers
I guess he’s hoping McPain notices that he’s a team player.
To: Clear Rivers
Sanford says federal law won't allow the state to impose fines that range that high. Sanford has vetoed other bills that he believed would not stand up in the courts. He is a real stickler for the law.
9
posted on
05/02/2008 7:14:29 AM PDT
by
Between the Lines
(I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
To: Clear Rivers
Lets see if he is VP materiel.
10
posted on
05/02/2008 7:18:51 AM PDT
by
CPT Clay
(Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW ,)
To: Tennessee Nana; AuntB; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Czar; pissant
11
posted on
05/02/2008 7:19:07 AM PDT
by
Liz
(Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
To: Clear Rivers
McCain-Goober state, nuff said.
12
posted on
05/02/2008 7:29:58 AM PDT
by
Biblebelter
(Barry, your Uncle Jeremiah is speaking now, Barry can you hear him, Barry what you say now.)
To: Between the Lines
This has been a heated debate in SC for weeks and the state senate is the biggest bunch of liars in the country!!! The Senate blames the House, the House blames the Senate and then they all turn around and blame Sanford!
Sanford supported E-Verify which was adopted by OK, etc. SC has the largest increase in Mexican illegals in the entire country!!! So what does the senate do???? They pass a bill with SC-9...their version of the federal I-9 form. And the catch is, there is no SC-9 form! It doesn't exist!! They say it will be developed. Basically all it will be is a state version of I9 and that isn't good enough!! We are overrun in this state with illegals and it has cost this state more then it's citizens even realize!! Sanford is trying to do all he can to stop the flow of illegals into our state especially since GA has now adopted a tougher law. This states politicians are an embarrassment
13
posted on
05/02/2008 7:38:34 AM PDT
by
4everontheRight
("Boy, those French: They have a different word for everything! "- Steve Martin)
To: Liz
And this is the guy that some people say would make a great conservative VP for McCain ?????
To: Tennessee Nana
Maybe he’s doing this to make himself more attractive to McCain.
15
posted on
05/02/2008 12:03:57 PM PDT
by
JZelle
To: Tennessee Nana
All puckered up, on his knees, sucking up to illegals-—just like McC.
16
posted on
05/02/2008 12:10:00 PM PDT
by
Liz
(Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
To: Tennessee Nana
THIS JUST IN A US crackdown is causing the longest and most significant drop in illegal migration from Mexico since the Sept. 11 attacks.
Officials say the U.S. economic downturn, tighter security and a more perilous and expensive journey are persuading many who try to sneak into the US to give up sooner.
Border Patrol arrests are down 17 percent so far this year along the US-Mexico border after falling 20 percent all of last fiscal year and 8 percent the year before that.
While it’s impossible to know how many people are crossing illegally, the Patrol uses apprehensions to estimate the ebb and flow of traffic.
Migrant smugglers have to hunt for business at border-town shelters.
Many deported migrants give up after one try, taking their government up on free bus rides home.
17
posted on
05/02/2008 12:15:42 PM PDT
by
Liz
(Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
To: Liz
Don't make me laugh--$10K is a slap on the wrist.
Try $25K. Much better attention getter.
18
posted on
05/02/2008 3:40:23 PM PDT
by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: Czar
I guess $10K is the suggested “campaign contribution.”
19
posted on
05/02/2008 4:15:04 PM PDT
by
Liz
(Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
To: Moose4
What I cant figure out is when Glenn McConnell went off his meds. Good question.
There must be something else going on.
To: Clear Rivers
Mark Sanford's one of my favorites, and this is another reason why. If he signs an illegal law, it gets tossed out of court. I know there's been a lot of debate over what Hazelton has done on this issue and they had troubles with the courts.
My gut feeling tells me that the pols in the State Senate want to pass a law they KNOW will be thrown out, have Sanford sign that. The courts then become the bad guys when it is tossed, and then say "We did what we could do, but the courts tossed it out."
21
posted on
05/02/2008 4:46:38 PM PDT
by
Darren McCarty
(Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
To: Biblebelter
Why sign a bill that will get tossed out of court anyway? Do it legally, and get the job done right.
22
posted on
05/02/2008 4:51:01 PM PDT
by
Darren McCarty
(Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in - Michael Corleone)
To: Darren McCarty
I wish folks would read this article before jumping down Sanford’s throat. He prefers real solutions to grandstanding that accomplishes nothing.
23
posted on
05/02/2008 8:11:54 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: Clear Rivers
I understand the Senate version will only apply to employers with more than 100 employees. That will be no deterrent to all the landscapers, contractors, etc. that use illegal workers.
24
posted on
05/05/2008 7:44:38 PM PDT
by
Lynne
To: Clear Rivers
Wow. I used to think the world of Gov Sanford. Maybe the rumors that he wants to be McLame’s VP are true, because he's using McClame-like excuses to avoid solving a pressing problem in SC. Sign the bill already Mark!! Sheesh.
25
posted on
05/10/2008 11:36:26 AM PDT
by
LifeOrGoods?
(Liberalism=stupidity=Obama=false 'hope'=true defeat)
To: LifeOrGoods?
Disregard my knee-jerk reaction in my last post. Sanford is once again right on this one. Give ‘em hell Mark!!!!!!!!!!!!
26
posted on
05/10/2008 11:43:24 AM PDT
by
LifeOrGoods?
(Liberalism=stupidity=Obama=false 'hope'=true defeat)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson