[Grunthor]

If people are “born gay” that would mean that there is a “gay gene” that has yet to be identified. Should this ever be identified, would gays really want that information to be let out given pre-natal testing and the easy availability of abortion “services?”

[TigersEye]

If people are “born gay” that would mean that there is a “gay gene” that has yet to be identified. Should this ever be identified, would gays really want that information to be let out given pre-natal testing and the easy availability of abortion “services?”

If abortion on demand is going to remain the law then that information should be available to all prospective parents.

[PapaBear3625]

If people are “born gay” that would mean that there is a “gay gene” that has yet to be identified.

They would regard a prenatal test for the gay gene as being a hate crime, and would firebomb any lab facility that dared to process such tests

[RoadGumby]

Lets take that one step further. Your child is to be born in 3 months, the Dr says that it has been identified to be a carrier of the ‘Gay gene’. You decide to abort it. Is this a hate crime? Should you be ‘forced’ to carry to term to support diversity?

[ResponseAbility]

——If people are “born gay” that would mean that there is a “gay gene” that has yet to be identified. Should this ever be identified, would gays really want that information to be let out given pre-natal testing and the easy availability of abortion “services?”——

Especially since President Bush signed into law the Newborn Genetic Screening bill.

[wideminded]

If people are “born gay” that would mean that there is a “gay gene” that has yet to be identified.

It could also mean that these people have been exposed to abnormal levels of hormones or some other substances before birth.