Looks like the FLDS already compelling to the courts.
1 posted on
05/06/2008 5:16:55 AM PDT by
MrEdd
To: Politicalmom; greyfoxx39; MizSterious; brytlea; metmom
2 posted on
05/06/2008 5:19:56 AM PDT by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: MrEdd
3 posted on
05/06/2008 5:22:26 AM PDT by
ukie55
To: MrEdd
Those “siezed records” are what is commonly known as “evidence”. I love how the article skillfully neglects to mention why the defense attorney objected to using the documents and just mentions that the judge denied the objection.
4 posted on
05/06/2008 5:23:55 AM PDT by
contemplator
(Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
To: MrEdd
Texas handles the
Sacred FLDS Census Texts with unclean hands...
...untimely ripped from the Sacred FLDS Tabernacle!
To: MrEdd
Another article said that the state was refusing to accept official Utah birth and marriage certificates as legal evidence.
To: MrEdd
I hate to be a fly in the Vaseline here, but can someone please tell me what offense these 13 purported monogamous couples committed that permitted the State to seize their children at gunpoint and then further compound the trauma by transfering parental custody to the State without individual hearings?
Cordially,
174 posted on
05/06/2008 11:08:45 AM PDT by
Diamond
To: MrEdd
placemarker
248 posted on
05/06/2008 5:53:26 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson