Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djmv

2016 is way too late for Hillary. She’d be pushing 70, right about as old as “too old” McCain is now.

It’s now or never for the Hills, and it’s looking like “never” has a big lead...


13 posted on 05/07/2008 1:23:54 PM PDT by Loyolas Mattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Loyolas Mattman
It’s now or never for the Hills

Nope, it's now or 2012. (We agree that 2016 is beyond her reach). And obviously the only way she can run in 2012 is if McCain wins in '08.

16 posted on 05/07/2008 1:30:23 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: All

Tactically speaking, a staunch conservative would not be the optimal choice to face the far left Obama. A moderate centrist is, because Independent moderates decide elections.

McCain is a moderate centrist with years of the label “independent maverick” on him.

You pick the rightward most candidate who is viable. Pretty much always. FR chose to split among those and favored an unviable, underfunded and outstaffed candidate, and that fracturing of support yielded McCain — who it turns out is tactically optimal against an excellent speaker who is a far left wing liberal. McCain will do better against him than a staunch conservative would do — because of the independent moderates being, as always, decisive.

I think McCain will win. The center will once again decide the election — as it always has.


18 posted on 05/07/2008 1:33:10 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson