Skip to comments.
Clinton Aides Doubtful About Future (Warn of "October Surprise" to Sink Obama in Fall)
The Washington Post ^
| May 7, 2008
| Perry Bacon Jr. and Anne E. Kornblut
Posted on 05/07/2008 1:51:12 PM PDT by ReagansRaiders
Her aides also tried to stoke concerns yesterday among elected officials and party leaders, known as superdelegates, about whether Obama could win in November, with one warning of an "October surprise" that could ruin his chances.
. . .
A Clinton adviser said the situation was increasingly becoming one in which "she cannot be nominated and he can't get elected."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; clinton; hillaryclinton; obama; octobersurprise; scandal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
They've got the dirt on him. Supposedly, they were going to use it before the PA primary, but then he imploded with his bitter small town comment and they didn't need to. They're keeping this in their pocket to sink him in Nov. so she can run again in 2012.
They've also go the dirt on former VA Gov. Mark Warner who is running for the U.S. Senate this year (particularly nasty stuff I might add.) That is the real reason why he didn't run. (Look for clues in that video as to the real reason. When it comes out, the clues will be pretty clear.)
To: ReagansRaiders
"October surprise" that could ruin his chances."
If that was true a Clinton Proxy would have dropped it on Obama.
To: ReagansRaiders
Larry Sinclair? He’s self destructed with ‘new’ accusations that Obama killed a former gay lover.
3
posted on
05/07/2008 1:53:39 PM PDT
by
BlueStateBlues
(Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
To: Anti-Bubba182
Why drop it now when it won’t do any good and it gives him a chance to move past it? She’s patient and can wait.
4
posted on
05/07/2008 1:54:31 PM PDT
by
ReagansRaiders
(Jeb Bush 2012 -- The only Bush who should ever have been president)
To: ReagansRaiders
5
posted on
05/07/2008 1:55:45 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: ReagansRaiders
“she cannot be nominated and he can’t get elected”
Kinda has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it?
To: ReagansRaiders
Watched the Mark Warner video, and I guess Im dense. What’s the clue? Gay (he seems gay in the interview)? On my quick look I’ve missed it.
7
posted on
05/07/2008 1:57:01 PM PDT
by
BlueStateBlues
(Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
To: ReagansRaiders
while I understand the Clintons think Obama can’t win the general election, what I don’t understand is how any of that somehow makes Hillary more electable. Hillary has such high negatives that I am doubtful that she could win the general election. Yet according to the Clintons, Hillary is just soooo electable, while Obama is not. Okay.........
To: BlueStateBlues
No, he did not self destruct. he is being interviewed by the Chicago PD though.
9
posted on
05/07/2008 1:58:37 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: ReagansRaiders
I was wondering why Warner didn't throw his hat into the ring.
He would have been the ideal choice for the Democrats.
10
posted on
05/07/2008 1:59:12 PM PDT
by
Cyropaedia
("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
To: ReagansRaiders
A Clinton adviser said the situation was increasingly becoming one in which "she cannot be nominated and he can't get elected."I pray that this is so.
11
posted on
05/07/2008 1:59:29 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
To: ReagansRaiders
“Why drop it now...?
So she can get the nomination herself.
To: ReagansRaiders
Great, that means Huma will become available!
13
posted on
05/07/2008 2:00:21 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(You're gonna cry 96 Tears on my Pillow!)
To: ReagansRaiders
You could have video footage of Obama smoking crack with Osama Bin Laden while having sex with a goat at a Nazi cross burning, and it wouldn’t cost Obama a single vote.
To: ReagansRaiders
...with one warning of an “October surprise” “
So basically she’s threatening the superdelegates AND Obama now...
15
posted on
05/07/2008 2:01:22 PM PDT
by
mo
To: mo
16
posted on
05/07/2008 2:02:33 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: ReagansRaiders
What surprise? His closeness with his Pastor, Ayres and Dohrn is well known.
17
posted on
05/07/2008 2:02:36 PM PDT
by
Ukiapah Heep
(Shoes for Industry!)
To: Question Liberal Authority
Except for the PETA people, who would feel for the goat.
18
posted on
05/07/2008 2:03:32 PM PDT
by
BlueStateBlues
(Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
To: ReagansRaiders
There may be an October Surprise for Obama, but the Clintons don’t have it, or they’d have used it weeks or months ago. Hill and Bill want to win NOW, not four years from now. This is whistling past the graveyard by demoralised Clinton staffers, who bet on the wrong horse and will soon be out of a job.
19
posted on
05/07/2008 2:20:33 PM PDT
by
LadyNavyVet
(The NC GOP is McCain's maverick.)
To: ReagansRaiders
That “October Surprise” is likely to be Wright’s new Book...
20
posted on
05/07/2008 2:21:54 PM PDT
by
tcrlaf
(VOTE DEMOCRAT-You'll look great in a Burka!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson