OMFG!!! That's your definition of "amnesty" (and your defense), then? "He didn't actually use the word amnesty" -- ?!?
Sorry, but I just couldn't continue any further, after that. "He didn't actually use the word amnesty..." That wouldn't even pass muster as genuine rebuttal by junior high school debate team standards! And you actually have the sack to accuse others of "redefining terms" -- ?!?
Oh, I am so going to be pressing this one into my scrapbook, tonight! ROTFLMAO!!!
So, anyone who comes to the US, follows the laws to become a legal resident is thereby offered amnesty? Is that your stance?
Because as I read the original legislation - and the commentary on both sides about it - it seems that it only provides residency for those who register, who pay their fines, and file their taxes. You don’t do that, you’re out.
So is that amnesty? As opposed to that actually granted by President Reagan? In your opinion President Reagan must have been a lousy President because he blatantly and fully supported even worse - blanket “you’re here, it’s OK nothing is required” amnesty for millions.
But that’s OK, you want to obfuscate and ridicule and not debate on actual facts. Usually the retreat of those finding themselve bereft of logical support.
"Crossing the border today is like a parking ticket . they are not criminals"--Juan Hernandez, advisor to presidential candidate John McCain
Wow...unfreakingbelievable.