Skip to comments.
Why Barack Obama may stumble if the House of Clinton falls.
Times Online (London) ^
| 10 May 2008
| Tim Reid
Posted on 05/10/2008 11:55:54 PM PDT by lowbuck
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: lowbuck
THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF CLINTON. Sounds like it could be an Edgar Allen Poe story.
21
posted on
05/11/2008 3:54:00 AM PDT
by
The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
(Using Hillary to nip Obama's heels is like beating a dead horse with an armed nuclear bomb.)
To: Hildy
There are few things I could think of that would be worse than
having Mrs. Clinton on the Supremes.
22
posted on
05/11/2008 4:08:14 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: Hugin
Middle America will not elect a black neo-Marxist Probably not. They will, however, elect a white neo-marxist.
23
posted on
05/11/2008 4:17:06 AM PDT
by
HerrBlucher
(Asked on his deathbed why he was reading the bible, WC Fields replied "I'm looking for loopholes.")
To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
THE FALL OF THE HOUSE OF CLINTON. Sounds like it could be an Edgar Allen Poe story. As long as the story ends with "Nevermore", I'm happy.
24
posted on
05/11/2008 4:18:51 AM PDT
by
HerrBlucher
(Asked on his deathbed why he was reading the bible, WC Fields replied "I'm looking for loopholes.")
To: lowbuck
No way Obomba picks Hitlary for VP. The odds are immense that Hitlary would shortly be President and Obomba would be in Ft. Marcy Park.
25
posted on
05/11/2008 4:19:56 AM PDT
by
jsh3180
To: skimask
What will be even more satisfying will all the treats we will hear about DUmmies moving out of the country. They always threaten to leave, but alas, never do.
26
posted on
05/11/2008 4:27:02 AM PDT
by
6SJ7
To: lowbuck
Like it or not, you’re not going to see a ticket without a white man on it. Whether you like it or not - them’s the facts, folks...SSZ
27
posted on
05/11/2008 4:35:31 AM PDT
by
szweig
(Had it up to here)
To: lowbuck
Whether Obama would pick Hillary as VP is irrelevant. Whether Hillary’s supporters would vote for Obama/Clinton is relevent and that is not a sure thing.
28
posted on
05/11/2008 4:38:45 AM PDT
by
DugwayDuke
(A true patriot will do anything to keep a Democrat out of the White House.)
To: lowbuck
Im telling you, she can win this thing, because of people like you, and places like this.
To: Hugin
Middle America will not elect a black neo-Marxist. Paul Begala had it right, there arent enough eggheads and African-Americans.Agree... and if the DNC denies him the nomination... we won't have enough water to put out the fires.
30
posted on
05/11/2008 5:04:00 AM PDT
by
johnny7
To: Hugin
Are there enough uneducated backward whites in the democrat party to put a candidate in the White House. Without at least 90% of the democrats most loyal base African Americans and all the new young voters can she be elected?
31
posted on
05/11/2008 5:08:14 AM PDT
by
mimaw
To: szweig
Exactly.
I read that there is speculation that the messiah is looking at Ted Strickland for VP because of his reputation as a "moderate" and his popularity in Ohio and his high rating from the NRA.
And I have no faith that the average American will have the ability to look past the window dressing to the marxist cesspool we'll be in if the messiah makes it to the White House- no matter who the VP is.
To: lowbuck
Obama is not dumb enough to have the Clintons on as VP to him nor does he fancy a foreshortened presidency.
33
posted on
05/11/2008 5:14:11 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: Hugin
Someone has to inform middle America that Obama is a neo-Marxist. Who’s going to do that? McCain won’t, because he too is a neo-Marxist (see his Global Warmening plans, see his destroy America thru illegal immigration plans).
34
posted on
05/11/2008 5:15:48 AM PDT
by
Jabba the Nutt
(I'm just a typical bitter, white, heteronormative space worm clinging to guns and God.)
To: Hildy
I think Clintons would take "second fiddle to Hussein. It is their surest and shortest path to the White House- two years or less- assuming they really can't snatch the nomination. Hussein would not offer it to Clintons for the same reason.
35
posted on
05/11/2008 5:17:40 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: Jeff Chandler
With McCain we may just possibly come out of the next four years with a Supreme Court not more liberal than it is. And if we manage to elect a bunch of conservatives to Congress this November (I think it will go the other way) we may dodge Amnesty and Kyoto II and the Fairness Doctrine.
36
posted on
05/11/2008 5:20:47 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: irishjuggler
Being a lawyer is not a requirement for the Court and was not always thought to be a superior asset.
37
posted on
05/11/2008 5:21:46 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: HerrBlucher
38
posted on
05/11/2008 5:24:10 AM PDT
by
The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
(Using Hillary to nip Obama's heels is like beating a dead horse with an armed nuclear bomb.)
To: lowbuck
the whitest, oldest and most rural electorates in America The subtle under-current in this statement, repeated over and over in the liberal media, is the liberal journalists' relief that these people are old and will soon be dead and we won't have to put up with these racist, conservative Bible thumpers any more.
39
posted on
05/11/2008 5:24:51 AM PDT
by
Hardastarboard
(A Zero Tolerance Policy isnÂ’t a one way street.)
To: Joe Boucher
if Hussein is the president, Justice Clinton would be no worse from any others he would appoint. She would be less of a doctrinaire Marxist, though. She's too corrupt to keep her Marxism pure.
40
posted on
05/11/2008 5:25:06 AM PDT
by
arthurus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson