Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

I’d be interested in reading the arguments used in this brief to support their motion. I’m sure it’s simply faaaascinating.


2 posted on 05/13/2008 10:52:33 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (The secret of Life is letting go. The secret of Love is letting it show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bloody Sam Roberts

seems they are borrowing a page out of the current DOJ briefs to try and argue that the second amendment is NOT a fundamental right and subject to strict scrutiny.

They are trying to lay case law to overturn the anticipated DC case.


20 posted on 05/13/2008 12:07:27 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Judicial rules are that existing laws are to be given Judicial Notice, and are automatically part of the record of a court proceeding.

It is not supposed to be necessary for an attorney include a statement asking that the Judge take Judicial Notice of existing laws, or the Constitution.

The old saying regarding cases is:

If the law is on your side, you pound the law.

If procedures are on your side, you pound the procedures.

If neither are on your side, you pound the table.

It appears that Bloomy intends to pound the table.

21 posted on 05/13/2008 12:23:06 PM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts; neverdem

I saw a Superior Court judge here in Reno, Nevada threaten a man with immediate jail time if he said the words “US Constitution” again in his Court.


28 posted on 05/13/2008 6:57:06 PM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson