I’d be interested in reading the arguments used in this brief to support their motion. I’m sure it’s simply faaaascinating.
seems they are borrowing a page out of the current DOJ briefs to try and argue that the second amendment is NOT a fundamental right and subject to strict scrutiny.
They are trying to lay case law to overturn the anticipated DC case.
It is not supposed to be necessary for an attorney include a statement asking that the Judge take Judicial Notice of existing laws, or the Constitution.
The old saying regarding cases is:
If the law is on your side, you pound the law.
If procedures are on your side, you pound the procedures.
If neither are on your side, you pound the table.
It appears that Bloomy intends to pound the table.
I saw a Superior Court judge here in Reno, Nevada threaten a man with immediate jail time if he said the words “US Constitution” again in his Court.