Posted on 05/13/2008 4:41:47 PM PDT by pissant
Fine. Now: support the assertion, by all means, if you can.
No, that’s BS also. I did not insult you. So piss off.
Warnings
Call your doctor at once if you have any of these serious side effects:
increased blood pressure (severe headache, blurred vision);
nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, fast heartbeat; hallucinations, loss of coordination, fainting, coma;
seizure (convulsions);
extreme thirst with headache, nausea, vomiting, and weakness; or
easy bruising or bleeding.
Other less serious side effects are more likely to occur, such as:
drowsiness, dizziness, nervousness, or anxiety;
dry mouth, increased sweating;
nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation;
decreased sex drive, impotence, or difficulty having an orgasm;
headache, blurred vision;
tremor or chills; or
changes in appetite or weight.
Side effects other than those listed here may also occur — like belief in man made global warming.
http://www.drugs.com/effexor.html
Hello? My #51?
I should have known Barr wasn’t conservative enough for Malkin. Looks like she will be able to continue opposing everyone. Not my kinda conservatism.
Malkin cares about certain issues more than others. Illegal immigration for starters. Barr is weak. WOT? Worse still.
Second place: "Hey, we spend less than the other guys."
Third place: "Our conservative estimate is that John McCain will not allow every illegal into this country, just most of them." (lost because it was too long to fit on a bumper sticker, next to John Edwards' Police Action on Terror.)
That is, without a doubt, the single most perfect example of the psychological phenomenon cognitive dissonance it has ever been my disbelieving pleasure to witness online.
Wow.
Just... wow.
Go on, continue, by all means. I can't wait to see what fresh weirdness you've slated for an encore.
The low-hanging fruit of ridiculously high gas prices didn’t occur to them as a good cudgel to beat the rats over the head with. They definitely will deserve the change they get.
Ah. Capping it all off with a good old-fashioned barefaced lie (as #51 plainly demonstrates), as the rotted "cherry" atop your failed rhetorical sundae. A true classic from the Clinton Cookbook!
Simultaneously appropriate and pathetic. LOLOLOLOL!!!
Funny that you would speak of demonstration, when the entire concept is foreign to you. Again, I simply observed that Ms. Malkin is short on facts. That it played into your preconceptions, no question. No wonder at all that you would try to turn the resulting discussion into a “whose is bigger” contest.
Only 2, maybe 3, people will win the Presidency in Nov. A vote for the Libertarian party is a vote to let someone else make the choice for you. McCain is the best choice. It’s that simple for me.
“Change”? Why not “Improve”? At least it indicates a direction.
For the sixth (!!!) time, now: support this assertion, if you can.
Where’s the memo?
Quoted from directly, in the body of Ms. Malkin's story. Unless you're asserting, however coyly, that the memo either doesn't exist, or that Ms. Malkin is lying about its contents: the ball's now in your court.
I’m sorry, you and I are reading something entirely different. I’m simply going from the link that the original poster has provided. There is no citation to the memo that I can see.
The best winning message from the RNC should be “We will do whatever is necessary to lower the price of your gasoline”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.