Not only have you not read the testimony, evidently you haven't even studied the case. Ramos did not touch a casing. Read the post just above yours, post 71.
For starters, failing to tell the supervisor about the shoot would constitute a lie of omission.
He also didn't tell his supervisor he made a U-turn in the intersection while attempting to apprehend Davila. Another lie of omission?
“He also didn’t tell his supervisor he made a U-turn in the intersection while attempting to apprehend Davila. Another lie of omission?”
Actually, that one might have been a lie of omission since Ramos had no reason to think the supervisor had been informed of his U-Turn. (smiling)