Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Straight Vermonter
2 posted on
05/19/2008 6:04:29 AM PDT by
A. Morgan
(VOTE FOR A LIBERAL N' WE'LL BE UP TO OUR NECKS IN ILLEGALS and OUTA' GAS!)
To: Straight Vermonter
3 posted on
05/19/2008 6:09:43 AM PDT by
rawhide
To: Straight Vermonter
I didn't see in the article how they modulate reactivity.
Otherwise, what a great idea!
Too bad a president got rid of the National helium Reserve, though. Who needs Zeppelin in the 21st century?
4 posted on
05/19/2008 6:11:47 AM PDT by
DBrow
To: Straight Vermonter
We need to start building now, with a target of having at least 80% of our electricity be nuke within 10 years, and at least a doubling of our electric capacity (to accommodate electric cars, and a switchover from oil heat to electric heat in the Northeast)
6 posted on
05/19/2008 6:22:17 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
To: Straight Vermonter
The real beauty of the PBMR is its modularity.
A utility can start with a small unit and add on, as power demand increases.
7 posted on
05/19/2008 6:22:51 AM PDT by
kidd
To: Straight Vermonter; Uncledave; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; ...
PEBBLE BED REACTOR PING!!!!!...............
8 posted on
05/19/2008 6:23:29 AM PDT by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Straight Vermonter
Nukem of GermanyWhy does this name leave me feeling uneasy?
16 posted on
05/19/2008 6:50:34 AM PDT by
frithguild
(I hope for change when I give cash to the Man - but all I ever get is nickels and dimes.)
To: Straight Vermonter
I was going to bump for later reading but noted that it uses helium as the working fluid.
I read a few years ago that there was going to be a helium shortage in a few years. One of the major sources is in Kansas and it is predicted to run dry in a few years.
18 posted on
05/19/2008 6:56:26 AM PDT by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: Straight Vermonter
I’ve been a big fan of PBRs for a long time. Wish I could get one in my backyard!
20 posted on
05/19/2008 7:03:36 AM PDT by
Malsua
To: Straight Vermonter
21 posted on
05/19/2008 7:07:51 AM PDT by
Mrs_Stokke
(Exxon's profit margin -- 10-percent. Coca-Cola's is 20.7-percent, Microsoft -- 27.5-percent.)
To: Straight Vermonter
IMO, anything that gets rid of the iconic massive smoke stacks is going to do alot for deflecting NIMBYism.
22 posted on
05/19/2008 7:17:36 AM PDT by
Eepsy
(12-26-2008 +1)
To: Straight Vermonter
Exiting the reactor at some 1,650°F, the helium enters the turbine section of the horizontal single-shaft drivetrain. Operating at 6,000 rpm, the turbine drives both the gas turbine compressor and a speed reduction gearbox, connected to the 165 MW electrical generator. Pretty hot and pretty fast --- conventional gas turbines would rip themselves apart at that speed. And they must be way out on the edge of material sciences to have a rotating device that can deal with those temperatures. I wonder what their design looks like.
In the more usual open-cycle gas turbine, the turbine exhaust would exit to the atmosphere. But the PBMR runs in a closed loop, so the helium leaving the turbine first passes through a recuperator to transfer some of its heat, then into a pre-cooler and on to the low-pressure compressor.
I wonder why not run exhaust through a heat recovery steam generator and make it a combined cycle operation. Must have something to do with core physics.
23 posted on
05/19/2008 7:19:00 AM PDT by
Ditto
(Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
To: Straight Vermonter
27 posted on
05/19/2008 7:47:40 AM PDT by
VOA
To: Straight Vermonter
29 posted on
05/19/2008 8:05:56 AM PDT by
Centurion2000
(Party ahead of principles; eventually you'll be selling out anything to anyone for the right price.)
To: Straight Vermonter
“Me Magazine.”
I thought it was a more egocentric version of “Us” until at the end of the article it dawned on me that it stood for “M.E.”
< }B^)
31 posted on
05/19/2008 8:25:26 AM PDT by
Erasmus
(Nihilism never amounted to anything.)
To: Straight Vermonter
The only problem with this type of reactor is that it is much more difficult to reprocess the waste.
IMHO, reprocessing is key to the long-term viability of nuclear power.
To: Straight Vermonter
This a very nice description of Pebble Bed Reactors. Thank you for posting this.
43 posted on
05/19/2008 10:51:18 AM PDT by
AFPhys
((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
To: Straight Vermonter
Here's a real nice article on Nuke Power...
http://www.hillsdale.edu/hctools/imprimis_archive/2008/02/2008_02_Imprimis.pdf
46 posted on
05/19/2008 11:09:16 AM PDT by
Osage Orange
(Don't Hose Me, Bro...!!!)
To: Straight Vermonter
Pebbles Making WavesOnly because Bam-Bam taught her how....
53 posted on
05/19/2008 9:44:38 PM PDT by
Mygirlsmom
("My advice: Quit supporting the party that is symbolized by an ass." Ted Nugent)
To: Straight Vermonter
54 posted on
05/19/2008 9:48:37 PM PDT by
misanthrope
(Liberals just plain suck!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson