[DannyTN]

I see the appeals court didn’t order a return yet. So it seems the appeal ruling hangs on the definition of what “immediate” is.

[longtermmemmory]

I think it is a case of unscrambling eggs. However, now CPS will give an “ends justify the means and as long as we are at the CPS desired ends...” justification to continue on anyways.

[JasonC]

The court of appeals gave the trial judge 10 days to vacate the previous court order. If the state appeals to the state supreme court within that time, then the order might remain, frozen. Otherwise, the state loses any authority to hold the children in 10 days. And will be sued every which way from Sunday if it holds any of them five seconds longer.