Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lady lawyer

FYI


8 posted on 05/22/2008 10:51:55 AM PDT by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

“The appellate court ruled the chaotic hearing held last month did not demonstrate the children were in any immediate danger, the only measure of taking children from their homes without court proceedings.”

Precisely. That’s what I’ve been trying to explain to freepers. The only ones even arguably in danger of underage marriage were girls at or near puberty. And, even then, not all FLDS girls choose to marry before they are of age. I don’t think they force the girls. One can certainly argue persuasively that the young girls are not in an position to make a decision — that is the whole idea behind “age of consent laws” — but the “rape” that has occurred there, as I understand it is purely statutory. It is not the forcible rape of little kids that some freepers have been shouting about, with no substantiation.

There was absolutely no excuse for taking the little ones or the boys.


54 posted on 05/22/2008 11:07:50 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson