Unlike, for example, the supposed signatures on the IPCC’s propaganda sheets who DID in fact have non-scientific and sociology and psychology and literature and biology degrees, etc.
Why would it “disappoint me” if these 31,000+ scientists are valid?
....and if you look at the list provided in #19, they are not all valid.
This is the same tactic that GW theorists use to boost THEIR numbers and it’s just as disingenuous. MANY of those scientists on the Petition don’t know squat about climatology.
Even “they: give a rationale as to why non-related scientists get to be included.
Maybe I should sign it.....They could boost their PhD numbers by 1 (Immunology of Infectious Diseases), their BS numbers by 1 (Biology), and I even minored in climatology as an undergrad.
If you can’t see that they will take just about anyone with a science degree to boost their numbers....then sorry to disappoint you as it’s just plain ole true. Chemists, physicists, engineers, earth science (love that one), geology, geochemistry, geophysics, forestry, nuclear engineers, mece engineers, aerospsace engineers, chemical engineers, biochemsts, biologists, entomologists, zoologists, animal science (whatever THAT is...sounds like biologist for those too lame to take the tough courses)....medical science....medicine.......all these and more give nothing more than a passing glance at climatology, if at all, to get a degree and do not study climatology in their field.
....so what the frig would THEY know any more than the volunteer researchers and scientists from unrelated fields that “they” boost their numbers with?