Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
According to the article a local realtor says the house will lose 1/3 of its value, meaning it will still be worth $100K more than he paid.

Considering that nothing is selling in this area unless it is in magnificent condition, has a great location, and is extremely handsome--and then only after six months to a year on the market--I don't know how this "local realtor" came up with that idea. Perhaps if this were still 2005 when buyers were being desperate and crazy, yes. Now, who would buy such a thing?

I'm not saying that my heart is bleeding for this guy--he could have sold it in 2005. But then someone else would be having this problem. These things are always unfortunate.

17 posted on 05/25/2008 5:31:01 AM PDT by ottbmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: ottbmare
These things are always unfortunate.

That is true, which is why they have to use the force of law.

18 posted on 05/25/2008 5:33:17 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (All of this has happened before, and will happen again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson