Audio at the link.
To: Dawnsblood
2 posted on
05/26/2008 2:05:02 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(Typical bitter white person, not voting for McCain, he's socialist.)
To: Dawnsblood
“they’re attacking on two grounds: One is that [violence is] not practical because it hasn’t achieved their purposes”
ie. they engage in terrorism and they die... what would appeasement on our part have accomplished?
To: Dawnsblood
More wishful thinking from libs at NPR. Their is non-stop attempts at murder by these murderers everyday and in every part of every conflict they are in accross the globe.
4 posted on
05/26/2008 2:08:52 PM PDT by
Nachum
To: Dawnsblood
“It is placing the souls of the people who commit this violence in great jeopardy.”
What about the souls of the victims?
To: Dawnsblood
I suspect that radical Islam is beginning to realize that they will have much greater success in attaining their aims by using western courts, institutions, and the endless credulity of the self-hating left, than through outright violence at this time. Islam needs to repackage itself as a religion of peace for a while, at least until it is in a better position to impose Islamic culture on the infidels--then the violence will resume.
6 posted on
05/26/2008 2:18:24 PM PDT by
giobruno
To: Dawnsblood
Wherever they are found, hit them hard and lay them down. Most importantly, do not stop until they are wiped from the earth.
8 posted on
05/26/2008 3:00:44 PM PDT by
steel_resolve
(We are living in the post-rational world where being a moron is an asset)
To: Dawnsblood
They are against violence. But, it is predictable that if you run into two Arabs that are against violence. You can bet that they are going to end up shooting each other. Our mistake was not in leaving them alone to kill each other in peace.
9 posted on
05/26/2008 3:03:37 PM PDT by
bilhosty
To: Dawnsblood
11 posted on
05/26/2008 4:58:08 PM PDT by
Valin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson