Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LBJ tapes show a strong connection to Israel
AP on Yahoo ^ | 5/28/08 | Beth Marshall - ap

Posted on 05/28/2008 12:48:35 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

JERUSALEM - Tapes of Lyndon Johnson's Oval Office conversations, released to the public for the first time on Wednesday, reveal that the American president had a personal and often emotional connection to Israel, a scholar said.

In the first public presentation of the tapes Wednesday at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Professor Robert Johnson said this connection influenced his policy decisions and helped lay the foundation for the special relationship between the two nations.

"I sure as hell want to be careful and not run out on little Israel," Johnson said in a March 1968 conversation with his ambassador to the United Nations, Arthur Goldberg. The recording was released to researchers on May 1, according to the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum, in Austin, Texas.

President Johnson was known by his initials, LBJ. While he was in office from 1963 to 1969, the United States became Israel's chief diplomatic ally and primary arms supplier. He was also the first U.S. president to invite an Israeli premier on a state visit when he brought Prime Minster Levi Eshkol to Washington, D.C. in 1964.

"This is really the foundation of what we think of as U.S.-Israeli strategic partnership," said Johnson, a professor of history at Brooklyn College in New York and this year's Fulbright chair in the humanities at Tel Aviv University. He is not related to Lyndon Johnson.

The tapes document LBJ's growing belief in the importance of Israel throughout his administration.

Relations solidified when the United States offered to support Israel against its Arab neighbors in the 1967 Mideast war, as long as the Jewish state did not act as an aggressor.

In a taped conversation from June 25, 1967, about three weeks after Israel defeated three Arab armies, LBJ relates a conversation with Soviet Premier Alexey Kosygin.

"He couldn't understand why we'd want to support the Jews — 3 million people — when there are 100 million Arabs," the president said. "I told him that numbers do not determine what was right. We tried to do what was right regardless of the numbers."

Professor Johnson said, "It's one of the starkest expressions of a moral obligation to Israel that came from an American President."

Regina Greenwell, the foreign policy archivist at the LBJ Library and Museum, said all existing evidence backs up the argument that LBJ had positive feelings for Israel.

"He did always have support for Israel," said Greenwell, who has listened to all the existing Oval Office tapes. But "he was also trying to balance both sides in the Cold War atmosphere."

For example, other taped conversations reveal that LBJ supported bolstering King Hussein of Jordan with U.S. military assistance, she said.

"Hussein was a moderating force and the theory was that if Hussein couldn't get arms from us he'd turn to the Soviets, just as (late Egyptian President Gamal Abdel) Nasser got assistance from the Soviets," Greenwell said.

Professor Johnson said that LBJ, who died in 1973, had a romanticized view of Israel that paralleled his view of his home state of Texas: a frontier nation filled with self-made men, often misunderstood by the outside world.

Since LBJ, there have been ups and downs, but in general, U.S.-Israel ties have been strong.

"If you think of the U.S.-Israeli relationship now it's certainly more complex," said Johnson. "But the basic strategic partnership is the same as under (President) Johnson."

Johnson said LBJ's attitude toward Israel is similar to that of another Texan: President Bush.

"It's not as if Bush has a grand strategic plan, because he doesn't," Johnson said. "It's personal, it's emotional, it's the kind of context that you see with (President) Johnson."

Johnson was one of six presidents to tape his Oval Office conversations with a specially installed recording system. Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and Eisenhower taped some of their meetings. Kennedy, Johnson and, famously, Richard Nixon taped nearly all their conversations.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: israel; lbj; lbjtapes; proisrael; strongconnection; tapes

1 posted on 05/28/2008 12:49:14 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

LBJ gave Lady Bird as an engagement present a collection of essays warning about the Holocaust. This was pre-WW II.


2 posted on 05/28/2008 12:53:34 PM PDT by kenavi ("My mudder thanks you, my fodder thanks you, and Obama thanks you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Good on him. I never cared for LBJ but he just moved up a few notches on my like list.


3 posted on 05/28/2008 12:59:21 PM PDT by fish hawk (Silence is often misinterpreted but never misquoted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Must be revive LBJ day for the commies at AP. They’ll do Robert McNamara next.


4 posted on 05/28/2008 1:02:15 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

LBJ, the reighteous gentile, Eh?
“gotta make sure he didn’t run out on “little Isreal”
He had his hands full betraying the half million American soldiers he had put in Vietnam, making sure all the while he did not upset the Chinese and Russians who were killing them.
It might have been more of a problem to him politically, but depending on the circumstances he would have run out on “little Israel” just as he did the “little Vietnam.
He was a moral vacumn.


5 posted on 05/28/2008 1:06:16 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Remember, this was during the pre-terror era, when the plight of Israel garnered more worldwide sympathy than the Palestinian “plight”. Today’s anti-Israel sentiment among western liberals really dates from the 1982 invasion of South Lebanon.


6 posted on 05/28/2008 1:06:45 PM PDT by PC99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

You know I had the same thoughts about LBJ as I read that.


7 posted on 05/28/2008 1:07:38 PM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
McNamara is a different story. I can't think of anything he could possibly do to redeem himself with me. He should be behind bars for all his screw ups.
8 posted on 05/28/2008 1:12:26 PM PDT by fish hawk (Silence is often misinterpreted but never misquoted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
Granted I was born the early 70's and it wasn't until the 90's that I became aware of the history of McNamara's history. Behind bars isn't good enough.
9 posted on 05/28/2008 1:20:38 PM PDT by wally_bert (Tactical Is Still Missing A Chair!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How many of LBJ’s tapes still haven’t been released? Or have some been transcribed but never “heard”?


10 posted on 05/28/2008 1:46:57 PM PDT by weegee (We cant keep our homes on 72 at all times & just expect that other countries are going to say OK -BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Me, too.

LBJ, for all his flaws, stands in stark contrast to the Islamaphillic turds in the Democractic machine now.


11 posted on 05/28/2008 1:48:03 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (McCain is the best candidate of the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Kennedy, Johnson and, famously, Richard Nixon taped nearly all their conversations.”

Nixon’s tapes are the most famous because they were released to the media as a partisan witchhunt was waged.

Since then we’ve heard some corruption on the Johnson tapes and infamously the Kennedy tapes are suppressed for another couple decades.


12 posted on 05/28/2008 1:48:10 PM PDT by weegee (We cant keep our homes on 72 at all times & just expect that other countries are going to say OK -BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PC99

Why are liberals okay with Islam’s takeover of Lebanon but upset with Israel’s dispute?

Lebanon was once Christian.


13 posted on 05/28/2008 1:49:38 PM PDT by weegee (We cant keep our homes on 72 at all times & just expect that other countries are going to say OK -BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weegee

no idea,, here’s the link to the LBJ museum in Austin, press release with more info..

http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/

THis is from that site

LBJ Library has released telephone conversation recordings for the first 4 months of 1968, arguably one of the most turbulent years in American history [more...]
http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/press.hom/press_releases_details.cfm?ID=128


14 posted on 05/28/2008 1:51:33 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian
Time and the leftist are doing this to America. When I was a kid I thought Harry Truman was a decent man. The Democrats back in those days were about where the moderate Republicans are today. I still voted Republican but did not detest those Democrats like I do the leftist Democratic Party of today. I would vote Democratic if guys like Zell Miller were still around as their leaders but they have gone socialistic/commie over the years. It's a disease that is spreading to the Republican party of today, John McCain makes my point.
15 posted on 05/28/2008 2:04:26 PM PDT by fish hawk (Silence is often misinterpreted but never misquoted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kenavi
LBJ gave Lady Bird as an engagement present a collection of essays warning about the Holocaust.

What a romantic.

16 posted on 05/28/2008 2:29:17 PM PDT by krb (If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

Also among LBJ's reasons, Israel's 1967 victory lengthened the Soviets supply line to Vietnam by closing the Suez. Jimmah should be remembered for returning two canals.

17 posted on 05/28/2008 2:59:44 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

Also among LBJ's reasons, Israel's 1967 victory lengthened the Soviets supply line to Vietnam by closing the Suez. Jimmah should be remembered for returning two canals.

18 posted on 05/28/2008 2:59:44 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krb

Probably just some old stuff Henry Ford gave him for helping with a union problem.


19 posted on 05/28/2008 3:01:25 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
"When I was a kid I thought Harry Truman was a decent man. The Democrats back in those days were about where the moderate Republicans are today. I still voted Republican but did not detest those Democrats like I do the leftist Democratic Party of today. I would vote Democratic if guys like Zell Miller were still around as their leaders but they have gone socialistic/commie over the years. It's a disease that is spreading to the Republican party of today, John McCain makes my point."

I feel much the same way, fish hawk. When I was a kid, the Democrats back then were more liberal than most Republicans, but in today's spectrum, the current Dem party would disown them. The Dems back in my childhood were very anti-communist and understood that our differences stopped at the shoreline, they would never have pulled the stunts the current set of Dems do. If Zell Miller was running today, I could definitely consider voting for him. But somewhere in the early 70s, most Dems went hard left and these days are maybe one shade lighter red than Lenin's drawers. Today's "moderate" GOP types (McAmnesty, Specter, etc.) would have been the liberal Dems I recall from my childhood.
20 posted on 05/29/2008 4:16:00 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Hillary, Obama, McCain. Curly, Larry, Moe. Decisions, decisions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson