Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten states urge Calif. court to delay marriage ruling
AP via SFGate ^ | 5/30/8

Posted on 05/30/2008 11:11:45 AM PDT by SmithL

San Francisco, CA (AP) -- The attorneys general of 10 states are urging the California Supreme Court to delay finalizing its ruling to legalize same-sex marriage.

The states involved are Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah.

The attorneys general say they have an interest in the case because they would have to determine if their states would recognize the marriage of gay residents who wed in California. They want the court to stay its ruling until after the November election,

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; caglbt; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; samesexmarriage; sanfranciscovalues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: DoughtyOne
Finally, I will be able to marry my computer.

Well, computers.

PC and laptop.

Oh, darn plural marriages are taboo.

21 posted on 05/30/2008 12:43:42 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

See, I knew you supported those FLDS types!!!!

Neither of your computers are over 18 and you know it.

LOL


22 posted on 05/30/2008 12:45:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Votes to Pass Leftist Policy: McCain Senators 90, House 375 / Obama Senators 58, House 275.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

You are wrong. The Defense of Marriage Act passed back during the Clinton years states:

1. No state need treat a relationship between persons of the same sex as a marriage, even if the relationship is considered a marriage in another state.

2. The Federal Government may not treat same-sex relationships as marriages for any purpose, even if recognized as such by one of the states.


23 posted on 05/30/2008 2:13:59 PM PDT by Balke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Balke

Very good. Thanks for reminding me of that legislation.


24 posted on 05/30/2008 2:47:08 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Votes to Pass Leftist Policy: McCain Senators 90, House 375 / Obama Senators 58, House 275.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Thank God that 27 states have passed constitutional amendments in their state constitution to prevent that from happening.

No, no, no, no. That isn't what will happen. The gays have been telegraphing this strategy for 15 years. This is a federal constitutional attack on state laws using Article IV's Full Faith and Credit Clause to force all 49 other states to recognize at face value homosexual "marriages" (jokes) performed in a rolled 50th state.

With Massachusetts in hand, the federal suits are already in court in several states. Pace the Massachusetts law, the first thing the movement gays who got "married" that first day in Massachusetts did, was to get on the plane and fly to other states to demand that clerks of court record their Massachusetts "marriage" documents -- and promptly sue, when they were duly sent away.

Evan Wolfson drew up this strategy long ago, when he was still at Lambda Legal Defense Fund.

Google on Wolfson +Vermont and you will find a 2001 interview in which he discussed this campaign, as well as the then recently-decided Dale case, in which SCOTUS exonerated the Boy Scouts USA from having to accept pederasts as adult Scouters.

It will take amendment of Article IV to intercept and stop the homosexuals' campaign.

The Supreme Court is the homosexuals' next stop, and I've read that they've got at least one gay homer on the Court ready to help whoop them to a win similar to Roe vs. Wade and the totally outrageous Lawrence decision in 2003.

25 posted on 05/31/2008 4:42:25 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Balke
DOMA is doomed. It was vulnerable to Article IV attack in court when it was passed, and Pres. Bush and all its sponsors knew it. It's an exercise in political cynicism -- a pacifier for social conservatives, to get them out to vote for economic conservatives who're gayer than Batman.

Bush is secretly on the side of the gays and has been since 2000. He's too cool to get his shirt wrinkled over stuff that is of concern to people with wrinkled shirts. Homosexual misconduct and political cabals are below the salt as far as he's concerned, as is anyone who thinks it's an important issue.

Bush has been playing to lose on both DOMA and RKBA, I promise you.

26 posted on 05/31/2008 4:48:53 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
If marriage isn't one man, one woman and Homosexual Marriage becomes law, then any type of relationship can seek legal marriage.

Michelangelo Signorile of the Village Voice in New York and other radical gays have been quite clear in stating that the goal of homosexual "marriage" is to delegitimize marriage itself.

They want society to disestablish marriage because the existence of marriage throws a shadow on every kind of nonmarital and extramarital liaison.

Homosexual joke-"marriage" is just a waystation.

27 posted on 05/31/2008 4:53:15 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

I agree. Also see an article that appeared a few years ago in “The Village Voice” called “The Radical Case for Gay Marriage” at http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0336,goldstein,46732,1.html .


28 posted on 05/31/2008 3:43:14 PM PDT by beejaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The Capitol Resource works to defend traditional marriage. Just as people favoring same sex marriage will be supporting organizations working for their cause, so we should do the same.
Please Mail Donations to:

Capitol Resource Family Impact
660 J Street, Suite 250
Sacramento, CA 95814


29 posted on 05/31/2008 3:46:50 PM PDT by beejaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beejaa
Looked at your link, thanx. Amazing how precious the Left's image of itself is -- holy vessels of freedom, bla bla bla, vistas of possibilities, bla bla bla, evil rightists with crippled personalities rushing to crush sprouting humaneness, bla bla, and so on and so on.

Ralph Waldo Emerson once said of some communists on their farm, "they look well in June. We will see them in December." We already know what life on the Left will look like after they get through decomposing society and screwing it up. They are truly impervious to life's lessons about what works, in their solipsistic pursuit of the Eternal Me.

30 posted on 06/01/2008 12:30:32 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson