To: mimaw
Bill and Hill have been far more injurious to our country than Obama could possibly be. Obama has never been President, so we can't say that for sure. Personally, I believe four years of Obama would be more destructive to these United States of America than the eight years we endured under Bill Clinton.
To: library user
Obama doesn't have the Chinese connections of the Clintons. Has everyone here forgotten what went on during the Clinton years? Have you forgotten the pardons of terrorists. Do any of you know who the Clintons are going to owe favors to if they regain the White House? How and from whom Bill has earned their fortune? Seems to me there has developed an almost irrational fear of a liberal Black man with a funny name that has erased memories of just how injurious the Clintons were to this country.
137 posted on
06/03/2008 6:02:37 AM PDT by
mimaw
To: library user
I believe four years of Obama would be more destructive to these United States of America than the eight years we endured under Bill Clinton. For all his flaws, Bill Clinton was no Jimmy Carter.
Obama is a Jimmy Carter without Carter's administrative experience and understanding of the military.
141 posted on
06/03/2008 6:03:35 AM PDT by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson