Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Sues Airline for Serving Peanuts
Fox News ^ | June 03, 2008

Posted on 06/03/2008 2:40:34 PM PDT by Baron OBeef Dip

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-166 last
To: Eric Blair 2084
BTW, I meant to applaud your assessment of this issue as stated in post 128: “It’s not the courts or the Gubmint’s job to protect her. It’s mine.”

Very well said.

161 posted on 06/05/2008 7:55:53 PM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel
Or they could take a train.

Haven't read "Murder on the Orient Express?"

162 posted on 06/05/2008 8:00:10 PM PDT by ThomasThomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan

Thanks. There is no way for Gubmint to protect her from every Pakistani street merchant roasting chestnuts and peanuts on the streets of NY or any other city. (if King Bloomberg was as committed to ridding NYC of peanut vendors as he was of ridding the city of smokers, he could probably do it. Just threaten the councilmen that he would support their opponent with his billions in the upcoming election)

I was a at a comedy club a few months ago for a friends’ engagement party. The “comedian” had a joke that was similar in nature to yours. “If a bite of a Snickers bar is enough to kill you, than you should do the world a favor and take yourself out of the gene pool.”

I looked at my wife, waiting for her to charge the stage with her steak knife. She laughed it off. And she is more hysterical about this than I am.


163 posted on 06/05/2008 8:18:54 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
The problem is that people have seen silliness before, so when there is a real medical issue, they just laugh it off...

We've been told that a whiff of second hand smoke will instantly kill

We've been told that if you don't wipe your ass with 2 sheets of toilet paper instead of wrapping it around your hand or if you don't trade in your Hummer H2 for a hybrid the world will blow up in a great big ball of fire.

I can't blame people for not believing the peanut allergy danger.

They've been lied to before. Why should they believe it?

164 posted on 06/05/2008 8:33:49 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
It is absolutely unreasonable to expect the entire world to cater to your special needs. Period.

Agreed. But if someone promises to cater to your special needs, I don't think it is unreasonable to hold them to that promise.

I think that is a better description of what happened here (assuming the mother is telling the truth). She wasn't expecting American to change their policy for her. She was only expecting American to follow their policy and their repeated assurances to her.

The American Airlines disclaimer also states that while they do not serve peanuts, they cannot and will not guarantee a peanut-free environment. And you know why? Because they can't, and every reasonable person on the planet understands that.

Of course. But American does say their own flight attendants will not serve peanuts. The mother in this story may have been comfortable with the risk posed from passengers eating their own peanuts, but not comfortable with the risk posed from having flight attendants walking up and down the plane offering peanuts to every passenger.

It's the mother's responsibility to take reasonable steps to avoid any risks that she doesn't find acceptable. If her story is true, then I think she did just that. It is reasonable to expect that an airline will honor its written policy and their assurances that peanuts won't be distributed during flights.

165 posted on 06/05/2008 9:21:03 PM PDT by timm22 (Think critically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
They've been lied to before. Why should they believe it?

I guess if they've never personally known someone who was impacted by such an allergy (or something similar), they could be skeptical. But that's no excuse for being nasty about it to those who have known or experienced it. (Not saying you are.)

166 posted on 06/06/2008 5:45:10 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-166 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson