Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jy22077

The comments below the article are quite interesting.

While I think the issue at the time was a lot less open and shut than was portrayed by the media, it seems clear that the whole Schiavo issue was a PR and public perception disaster for conservatism and (especially) the GOP.

Medical and family decisions were being made by politicians and legislatures, violating existing rules as needed to achieve a desired result.

Isn’t the attempt to change the rules in the middle of the game, and even after the game was over, exactly what we rightly criticized about Democrat behavior in the 2000 election?


10 posted on 06/03/2008 8:30:00 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
While I think the issue at the time was a lot less open and shut than was portrayed by the media, it seems clear that the whole Schiavo issue was a PR and public perception disaster for conservatism and (especially) the GOP.

Greeeatt.

Obama and the other rats are probably salivating over this. If this becomes a big issue like last time he wins 40+ states and the rats will most certainly will end up with more than a filibuster proof majority.

17 posted on 06/03/2008 9:28:53 PM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson