Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 353FMG
Admiral Fletcher You mean Spruance perhaps? Fletcher was basically taken out of fleet command functions after leaving the transports uncovered at Guadalcanal, and at Midway, he basically left it up to Spruance.
19 posted on 06/04/2008 11:32:29 PM PDT by mavfin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: mavfin
Fletcher was technically in charge. He was on the Yorktown and separated, from the other two carriers under Spruance. Yorktown had to be hastily repaired at and joined just before the battle.

Yorktown's aircraft took longer to return from recon patrols. Yorktown's was the carrier hit. Functionally, Spruance who commanded the other two in the place of Halsey, commanded the attack

22 posted on 06/04/2008 11:44:46 PM PDT by verklaring (Pyrite is not gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: mavfin
Fletcher was basically taken out of fleet command functions after leaving the transports uncovered at Guadalcanal, and at Midway, he basically left it up to Spruance.

When you think of US admirals, Nimitz, King, Spruance and Halsey come to mind, but never Fletcher. Fletcher has received criticism for his actions, whether justified or not. There is a very good book on Fletcher that is worth reading.

28 posted on 06/05/2008 12:00:33 AM PDT by eekitsagreek (Give me a Stanley Cup (or Amy Grant) PLEASE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: mavfin

Yep, you’re so right.


46 posted on 06/05/2008 8:35:26 AM PDT by 353FMG (What marxism and fascism could not destroy, liberalism did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson