Posted on 06/05/2008 1:46:17 PM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
As the construction industry has slumped, the unemployment rate among Hispanic immigrants has climbed, an analysis released Wednesday shows.
For the first time in five years, foreign-born Hispanics have a higher unemployment rate than do Hispanics born in the U.S., according to the Pew Hispanic Center's analysis of census and Labor Department data.
The unemployment rate for Hispanic immigrants was 7.5 percent during the first months of this year, compared with 6.9 percent among native-born Hispanics. During the same period in 2007, the rates were 5.5 percent and 6.7 percent, respectively.
"The unemployment rate has shot up because of the slump in construction and Hispanic workers had done very well finding jobs in the construction industry as it was booming," said Rakesh Kochhar, associate director for research. "Having become somewhat dependent on this industry, they were more vulnerable to the downturn."
An overwhelming majority of jobs lost in the construction industry were held by foreign-born Hispanics.
Mexican immigrants have been hardest hit; their unemployment rate jumped from 5.5 percent last year to 8.4 percent. The employment downturn added about 255,000 Hispanic immigrants, most of whom are Mexican, to the ranks of the unemployed.
Foreign-born Hispanics could have entered the country legally or illegally. The report does not divide the immigrant numbers along those lines although undocumented workers can be found in the construction industry. For that reason, stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws also has played a role in the job losses, Rakesh said.
"The workers were in the wrong sector, the wrong segment of that sector and in many cases the wrong place at the wrong time," said Michael Fix, vice president of the Migration Policy Institute, a Washington think tank that studies immigration issues.
Hispanic immigrants not only worked in construction, but largely in home construction, which is suffering a slowdown more so than commercial construction, a sector with more unionized workers.
Hispanic immigrants have continued to look for work after they lost their jobs, being counted as unemployed rather than as out of the job market.
But fewer immigrants of working age are joining the U.S. job market. The economic slump and increased enforcement are likely contributing to the shrinking numbers of new workers, Rakesh said.
Much of the decline for Hispanic immigrant workers appears to be among Central and South American immigrants. That suggests increased the Mexican government's own immigration enforcement on its southern border is deterring immigrants from traversing the country to find work in the U.S., Rakesh said.
Unemployment rates for non-Hispanics are lower than for Hispanics overall, 4.7 percent versus 6.5 percent in the first three months of this year.
Rakesh said U.S.-born Hispanics have more variety in job occupations and are less concentrated in the construction industry. Lower education levels compared with their non-Hispanic counterparts contribute to their higher unemployment rates, he said.
Other findings in the report:
_The leading areas for new jobs for Hispanics were in business services 203,000 new jobs and hospital and health services, 170,000 jobs.
_Hispanic women fared worse than Hispanic men.
_There were 462,000 more immigrants in the Hispanic work force in 2007. That is up slightly from 2006, but significantly lower than the 784,000 in 2005.
_ The Hispanic labor force, people age 16 or over who are working or actively looking for work, rose by 630,000 last year, a 3 percent increase compared to a 3.9 percent jump in 2006.
Thank God they can leech off welfare.
Getting canned from jobs Americans won’t do.
Are these “legal” foreign born immigrants? The author sure couldn’t address that part of the equation.
This is the sort of racism and intolerance I would expect of the mainstream media and, more generally, the leftists.
They lump legal immigrants together with the illegals in an attempt to wash the latter of their crimes by associating them with the legals. That said, as the son of two legal immigrants, one from a certain country not in this hemisphere that has both Spanish and American influences, I am disgusted by the media's attempt to equalize folks like my parents with the illegal aliens.
Time to go home, Pedro.
Excellent! Saved me a post.
bump that. The article was about illegals. Not hispanics. Not immigrants.
It's looks to me like the author was lumping them in together because he's talking about both legal and illegal Hispanics in the workforce. It seems that he would have separated illegals from legals if he could, but the government data he was reporting on does not delineate between Hispanics here legally and those here illegally.
I don't see the racism and intolerance here, or any grand conspiracy by the media. If you want to find conspiracies, maybe look closer at the government for not delineating between legal and illegal immigrants. They rarely ever do in any of their statistics. Look at prisons statistics for instance in addition to these labor statistics. I don't know that there is a great deal of sinister ulterior motive in the way the government reports this data either though. I think they don't delineate between legals and illegals because it's hard to who is legal and who is illegal, or even who is who for that matter. People are using fake documents, fake names. Much of the data the government collects is self report data, and people aren't always honest when reporting about illegal conduct. If they published the numbers they wouldn't be reliable accurate numbers anyway, so what's the point.
It's looks to me like the author was lumping them in together because he's talking about both legal and illegal Hispanics in the workforce. It seems that he would have separated illegals from legals if he could, but the government data he was reporting on does not delineate between Hispanics here legally and those here illegally.
I don't see the racism and intolerance here, or any grand conspiracy by the media. If you want to find conspiracies, maybe look closer at the government for not delineating between legal and illegal immigrants. They rarely ever do in any of their statistics. Look at prisons statistics for instance in addition to these labor statistics. I don't know that there is a great deal of sinister ulterior motive in the way the government reports this data either though. I think they don't delineate between legals and illegals because it's hard to who is legal and who is illegal, or even who is who for that matter. People are using fake documents, fake names. Much of the data the government collects is self report data, and people aren't always honest when reporting about illegal conduct. If they published the numbers they wouldn't be reliable accurate numbers anyway, so what's the point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.