Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TLI

Why should they do that? The TSC allowed seizure of evidence to take place. Seems to me that with so much court backing, CPS is preparing itself to take names and kick some tail!


50 posted on 06/05/2008 8:22:42 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

The TSC allowed seizure of evidence to take place.


I don’t think that was before the TSC but rather the criteria for taking the children into temporary custody absent a court order.


51 posted on 06/05/2008 8:27:31 PM PDT by deport ( -- Cue Spooky Music --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
The TSC allowed seizure of evidence to take place.

The Texas Supreme Court only ruled in the context of the Appeals Court order to return the kids based upon the lack of any evidence of "immediate danger" to the children. That was the only issue being ruled upon. That has nothing to do with any future attempt to utilize any gathered evidence in a criminal proceeding as that is a totally separate issue.

After getting caught with their wicks in the breeze by order of two separate Superior Courts to undo what they had done and their flimsy attempts to "justify" what they had done with a series of lame and totally false acusations CPS has set itself up to have every single future attempt to revoke custody of the kids from their parents laughed out of court. CPS will not be "kicking some tail" in this issue and might not be in many future issues as a direct result of this fiasco.

52 posted on 06/05/2008 8:37:23 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson