The earlier claim was that the warrants for seizing documents had already been ruled invalid.
I merely pointed out that the TSC did nothing about that matter.
And, you agree.
BTW, be sure to let everyone here know when you appear in a court regarding any of this F(lds) stuff. Maybe we can catch the film on the news.
No the Texas Supreme Court agreed with the Appeals Court in that the order to take the kids into custody “for their own good” was found to be excessive because other first step measures were not attempted. That is why The Texas Supreme Court upheld the Appeals Court ruling that reversed Judge Walters order to take the kids into custody. No first steps and failure to demonstrate “immediate danger.”
I merely pointed out that the TSC did nothing about that matter.
Based upon the finding that no first measures were requested by CPS there is no “matter.” It apparently exists in your imagination. What the Texas Supreme Court ruled on is quite clear and simple.
And, you agree.
Apparently you can not grasp the issues involved to the degree necessary to understand that I did not agree with you, I pointed out your errors. Much as I am having to do now.
BTW, be sure to let everyone here know when you appear in a court regarding any of this F(lds) stuff. Maybe we can catch the film on the news.
Looks like you are running a bit thin on logic and reason, what with reverting to such juvenile statements.